No feces in my garbage can
With all due respect to the Environmental Protection Administration, I find it illogical and unhealthy to dispose of toilet paper smeared with feces in a garbage can (“EPA flushes Tainan’s loo paper disposal campaign,” July 10, page 2).
I happen to be a person with a particularly sensitive digestive system and anything that can go in a garbage can can be accessed by flies. In a tropical country like Taiwan, there are lots of flies and they have facilitated access to the interiors of restaurants. You can see what I am trying to say here.
To make a long story less long, I believe that Taiwan has the resources and means to improve its sanitation systems and sewage treatment plants, as well as its plumbing and water dispersal and disposal methods. To fail to do so, or to disregard and delegitimize any attempt at such change, is to be naive.
Geoff Cohen
Nangang, Taipei City
Jesse Helms: misguided
It is hard to imagine how, and more importantly why, anyone would characterize US Senator Jesse Helms as a “hero” and a “champion” (“Jesse Helms: a hero and champion,” July 8, page 8). In doing so, Cao Changqing (曹長青) made gross miscalculations by overlooking some very fundamental issues.
To suggest that Helms “fought for freedom all his life” is ludicrous. Surely you know, Mr Cao, that Helms is probably best known for his opposition to the [US] Civil Rights Act of 1964, which outlawed segregation in schools, public places and employment, and protected the rights of women, African Americans and other minorities. In fact, I think it’s safe to say that had Helms and like-minded people prevailed in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s, you, sir, would not be enjoying the freedoms that you take for granted in the US today.
You also suggested that Helms should be applauded because he “opposed the Martin Luther King Day bill in 1983, saying that King had two associates with communist ties.” With respect, sir, this statement is not only baseless, but quite juvenile. We no longer live in a time when the mere utterance of the word “communism” fills people with fear for what might become of their livelihoods. That era dates back over half a century to the time of senator Joseph McCarthy, a man whom I’m sure you know history does not look favorably upon.
In today’s age of globalization, one would have to be living in a bubble not have any “associates with ties to communism,” as loose a phrase as that is.
That Helms supported Taiwan and the security of the Taiwanese people may be true. But in focusing so narrowly on this issue, Mr Cao, you have blinded yourself to the true nature of a man who opposed and repeatedly voted against the rights of women, homosexuals and minorities. To characterize such a man as someone who “fought for freedom” is misguided.
Konraad Kordula
Muzha, Taipei City
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations