Why do some people reach their creative potential in business while other equally talented peers don’t?
After three decades of painstaking research, the Stanford psychologist Carol Dweck believes that the answer to the puzzle lies in how people think about intelligence and talent.
Those who believe they were born with all the smarts and gifts they’re ever going to have approach life with what she calls a “fixed mindset.”
Those who believe that their own abilities can expand over time, however, live with a “growth mindset.”
Guess which ones prove to be most innovative over time.
“Society is obsessed with the idea of talent and genius and people who are ‘naturals’ with innate ability,” says Dweck, who is known for research that crosses the boundaries of personal, social and developmental psychology.
“People who believe in the power of talent tend not to fulfill their potential because they’re so concerned with looking smart and not making mistakes,” Dweck says.
“But people who believe that talent can be developed are the ones who really push, stretch, confront their own mistakes and learn from them,” she says.
In this case, nurture wins out over nature just about every time.
FALL FROM GRACE
While some managers apply these principles every day, too many others instead believe that hiring the best and the brightest from top-flight schools guarantees corporate success.
The problem is that, having been identified as geniuses, the anointed become fearful of falling from grace.
“It’s hard to move forward creatively and especially to foster teamwork if each person is trying to look like the biggest star in the constellation,” Dweck says.
In her 2006 book, Mindset: The New Psychology of Success, she shows how adopting either a fixed or growth attitude toward talent can profoundly affect all aspects of a person’s life, from parenting and romantic relationships to success at school and on the job.
She attributes the success of several high-profile chief executives to their growth mindset, citing an ability to energize a work force.
These include John Welch Jr of General Electric, who valued teamwork over individual genius; Louis Gerstner Jr of IBM, who dedicated his book about IBM’s turnaround to “the thousands of IBMers who never gave up on their company”; and Anne Mulcahy of Xerox, who focused on morale and development of her people even as she implemented painful cuts.
But Dweck does not suggest that recruiters ignore innate talent. Instead, she suggests looking for both talent and a growth mindset in prospective hires — people with a passion for learning who thrive on challenge and change.
After reading her book, Scott Forstall, senior vice president of Apple in charge of iPhone software, contacted Dweck to talk about his experience putting together the iPhone development team. Forstall told her that he identified a number of superstars within various departments at Apple and asked them in for a chat.
MAKING MISTAKES
At the beginning of each interview, Forstall warned the recruit that he couldn’t reveal details of the project he was working on. But he promised the opportunity, Dweck says, “to make mistakes and struggle, but eventually we may do something that we’ll remember the rest of our lives.”
Only people who immediately jumped at the challenge ended up on the team.
“It was his intuition that he wanted people who valued stretching themselves over being king of their particular hill,” she says.
People with a growth mindset tend to demonstrate the kind of perseverance and resilience required to convert life’s setbacks into future successes.
That ability to learn from experience was cited as the No. 1 ingredient for creative achievement in a poll of 143 creativity researchers cited in Handbook of Creativity in 1999.
Which leads one to ask: Is it possible to shift from a fixed mindset to a growth mindset?
Absolutely, Dweck says.
But, “it’s not easy to just let go of something that has felt like your self for many years,” she writes.
Still, she says, “nothing is better than seeing people find their way to things they value.”
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under