The legislature’s assessment of the Labor Insurance annual pension plan has entered the stage of inter-party negotiation. The Council of Labor Affairs (CLA) has directed the focus on the financial situation of the Labor Insurance Fund (勞保基金), suggesting that the basic benefit rate should be linked to the rate of insurance contributions. If workers demanded a higher rate of benefits from their Labor Insurance pension, their rate of contribution would be raised. Media reports say the contribution rate could rise as high as 13 percent, so that a contribution of NT$1,300 would have to be made for every NT$10,000.
The council has warned that if changes to the plan are not passed and the contribution rate remains unchanged, the Labor Insurance Fund will go bankrupt. Council of Labor Affairs Minister Jennifer Wang (王如玄), however, has given her “guarantee” that as long as the contribution rate hike passes, she will not allow the fund to become bankrupt during her term, and no ruling party would dare allow that to occur. But according to council calculations, even if changes to the pension passes, the fund will go bankrupt within 20 years.
All 9 million workers who are legally required to participate in labor insurance have the right to claim their benefits in a single withdrawal.
If the council is correct, then this is tantamount to informing workers that regardless of whether they choose to withdraw their benefits as a single sum or to receive annual payments, they must make higher contributions to the fund — yet in the end, the fund will still go bankrupt, and when that happens, the contribution rate will have to be increased further.
While the government wants to implement systemic reform, they are forcing workers to choose a policy with no future prospects. How can workers have any confidence in changes to the Labor Insurance annual pension?
The tax season has just passed and workers undoubtedly did not escape a single cent of what they owed. Oil, water, electricity and commodity prices are all rising and there is no telling when this inflationary trend will end.
Also, the National Pension will begin in October and more than 3 million people will be required to make a monthly contribution of NT$674. Workers can barely keep on top of daily expenses.
There are also the problems of an aging population, lower birth rate, middle-age unemployment, employment instability and employers passing on the costs of the labor insurance pension and labor insurance premiums. For the next several generations, the burden on workers will grow, yet the CLA still plans to raise Labor Insurance contributions.
The Civil Servant Pension Fund (公教退撫基金), the Civil Servant Insurance (公教保險), the Farmers’ Insurance (農民保險) and the National Pension — also social insurances — have clear legal stipulations that the final responsibility of payment should be borne by the government, or that any deficit should be taken from central funding.
However, the government is proposing that the basic rate of labor insurance senior benefits be linked to the contribution rate, thus treating workers as ATMs. It is extremely unfair to make this demand of them.
The Labor Insurance Fund should follow the example of other retirement insurance schemes: Allow the central government to form annual public budgets to contribute to the fund while maintaining the contribution rate, thus keeping the burden on workers at a minimum. But whatever we do, we should not rely on Wang’s “guarantee.”
Huang Yu-te is secretary-general of the Tainan County Confederation of Trade Unions and an executive member of the Workers’ Democracy Association.
Translated by Angela Hong
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under