Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) Minister Stephen Shen (沈世宏) unveiled his policies to the media on May 19. President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) also vowed to make all policies environmentally friendly at the opening ceremony of an annual NGO environmental conference on May 31.
After two weeks in power, the government leaders’ emphasis on domestic environmental protection is praiseworthy. Still, I have a few suggestions.
Shen said that, in the first six months of the administration, the EPA would push for 12 pieces of legislation, including an energy tax act, a greenhouse gas reduction act and a renewable energy development act.
However, the energy tax act and the renewable energy development act lie beyond the EPA’s authority. Because of the distribution of authority and responsibilities, the EPA is not likely to be able to push for these bills as it wishes without taking into consideration the position of the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Economic Affairs.
The 12 suggested drafts will merely be of symbolic value unless the different ministries can reach a consensus soon.
Passing the greenhouse gas reduction act would not be difficult given the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) legislative majority. However, the necessary legal framework for the proposed reduction act, which aims to set a time limit on reductions, is lacking. It should therefore be withdrawn and redrafted.
Furthermore, Shen has indicated that the future focus of policy will be on replacing orders and controls with economic incentives. However, any sort of economic incentive should be based on investigation into and understanding of pollution. Economic incentives are fine, but when regulations are broken and the environment is damaged, appropriate legal action should be taken.
Therefore, economic incentives cannot just be replaced by regulations; instead, economic incentives should be used to supplement regulations.
Shen should not overestimate the effects of economic incentives. Fees that are charged for air pollution control and recycling, clearance and treatment are all economic tools based on price restrictions. However, despite the hundreds of millions of NT dollars in fees levied each year, we have never been informed what tangible benefits these economic tools have for our environment.
Shen also stated that the debate surrounding the Suhua Freeway is not about the road itself, but more about the changes in the type of development Hualien will experience after it is completed. However, the debate should not merely be about whether the freeway will have a large impact on the environment, but also whether an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) should have been carried out when the idea was first proposed.
Ma’s environmentally friendly policies are not new and the correct term for such policies is Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA). The Treaty of Maastricht, for example, states that the formulation and execution of all EU policies must be based on the principle of environmental protection.
A similar principle is mentioned in Article 26 of Taiwan’s Environmental Impact Assessment Act (環境影響評估法) that requires EIAs on policies that may affect the environment.
However, the evaluation of the SEA system is only an internal evaluation carried out by the government and at times involves the Cabinet examining and approving its own policies. Thus, all of Taiwan’s SEAs since 2000 have been flawed.
For Ma’s environmentally friendly policies to work, the legally binding power of SEAs must be strengthened.
Wang Yu-cheng is an assistant professor of law at National Cheng Kung University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG AND DREW CAMERON
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.