Aid should flow freely
J. Michael Cole argues against providing monetary support to Sichuan Province (“Why are we sending aid to China?” May 23, page 8). At a time when international bodies and ordinary people are acting with grace, generosity and compassion to help those in dire situations, Cole’s position is oddly callous. In addition, the two reasons he invoked in support of his arguments are rather feeble.
First, Cole argues that outside aid to Sichuan would serve to exacerbate the uneven wealth distribution in the region. As he remarks, with outside assistance, “Beijing will have little incentive to make financial investments in the region on a scale that would ensure a catastrophe of this avoidable magnitude does not happen again.”
This is a deliberately pessimistic view. Why would it not be the case that the central government will make use of outside aid, in addition to its own financial resources, to reconstruct Sichuan in a way that would rapidly rebuild and strengthen its infrastructure?
In fact, as witnessed by the international community, the Chinese government has acted swiftly and decisively, spending millions on its rescue efforts. There is no logical reason to think that the government will lapse into a state of inaction as outside aid comes in. On the other hand, for the outside world to withhold aid would only serve to delay what could otherwise be a speedy and efficient rescue and reconstruction process. This would only aggravate the plight of the earthquake victims. Any compassionate human being would not want to see that happen.
Cole’s second argument is that Taiwan should refrain from offering help due to the political tension with the mainland. Luckily, many residents in Taiwan do not share this demagogic view. Therefore, Taiwanese celebrities and ordinary people alike are seen in mainland media and cyberspace making generous donations to help alleviate the plight of the victims in Sichuan.
The importance of this gesture apparently eludes people like Cole. Already, the rescue efforts of the Japanese team, as well as their generous donations, seem to have greatly mitigated and shifted the usually less-than-friendly views of that country among the Chinese.
Likewise, the goodwill from Taiwan has surely not gone unnoticed by the Chinese. Given that the political views of the Chinese are increasingly swaying their government’s actions, the perception of Taiwanese generosity and kindness would have benign consequences in political terms. Cole would need to factor this into his equation before making any prognostications on cross-strait relations.
In this natural disaster that has claimed the lives of tens of thousands and has inflicted pain on millions of others, it is somewhat disturbing that some people out there are discouraging help from being given to those unfortunate souls. Demagogues should not be encouraged. Compassion and aid must be allowed to flow freely to those in need.
Yin Bin
Los Angeles, California
Ideology for education
In his inaugural address, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) pledged “to eliminate inappropriate interference of various ideologies in education.” He did not say what these “inappropriate interference” or “various ideologies” were. If Ma is sincere about implementing a “new life for Taiwan,” he should promote Taiwanese ideology in education even more zealously than former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁).
Under the old Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) rule, students were not allowed to speak their own mother tongue — Taiwanese, Hakka or Aboriginal languages. If they accidentally used them, even just a single word or phrase, they would be fined or punished. They were forced to study Chinese history and geography without learning much about Taiwan. Hopefully, these are considered “inappropriate interferences” by Ma and Minister of Education Cheng Jei-cheng (鄭瑞城).
Schoolchildren in Taiwan should become familiar with Taiwan first so that they will not get lost in their own homeland or misidentify themselves when they meet foreigners or go abroad. It will be odd if a Taiwanese cannot speak Taiwanese. Nobody can deny that Taiwanese ideology or identity should be the soul of the people educated in Taiwan.
It’s nice to know that Ma will try to clean up the government. I hope all government officials and employees will take his statement that “power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely” as a warning against, rather than an encouragement for, corruption. Also, if Ma carries out his idea to “nullify the KMT’s assets,” he will set an excellent example in fighting corruption.
It is sad that Ma’s administration has deleted “Taiwan” from the Chinese-language version of the new government Web site.
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with