In tone, the inaugural address of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) differed distinctly from the one his predecessor, Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), made eight years ago. In substance, they were remarkably similar, particularly in setting Taiwan’s stance toward China.
After being sworn in on Tuesday, Ma was conciliatory, saying: “We will launch a new era of cross-strait relations.”
In contrast, Chen was defiant at his inauguration, declaring: “Taiwan stands up,” an echo of Chinese leader Mao Zedong (毛澤東) — Mao stood atop Tiananmen, the Gate of Heavenly Peace, in Beijing in 1949 and proclaimed: “China stands up.”
Both pronouncements were intended as declarations of independence.
Ma sounded less bold than Chen, but nonetheless asserted that Taiwan would resist Beijing’s attempts to take control of the nation, saying: “We will maintain the status quo.”
Therein lies the peril of continued confrontation that would be contrary to the conventional wisdom of many US and other Western “China hands.” They have contended that the return of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) to power heralds better relations between Taipei and Beijing. David Brown, of Johns Hopkins University, lauded “Ma’s more positive attitude toward China.”
With Ma having made the overture to fresh negotiations, it is Beijing’s turn to respond.
Ralph Cossa, president of the Pacific Forum, a Honolulu think tank, suggested Beijing may be pondering what to do now.
“Beijing knows how to deal with an unfriendly government in Taipei,” he said. “What Beijing doesn’t know is how to handle a friendly government in Taipei.”
Ma’s soft rhetoric masked a firm line that becomes apparent with scrutiny. He said negotiations, which broke down during the Chen regime, should resume based on a “1992 consensus” that called for mutual acceptance of a “one China” principle with different interpretations. Beijing has vigorously rejected that approach.
During his four-year term, Ma said, Taiwan will not unify with China. He urged China to discard its threat to use military force against Taiwan. Beijing has insisted that Taiwan is part of China and has given no evidence of giving up the threat of force. China’s People’s Liberation Army would surely oppose any hint of such policy.
Ma said: “We will strengthen bilateral relations with the United States, our foremost security ally and trading partner.”
Beijing has asserted that the US has been interfering in the internal affairs of China. Ma said Taiwan would “acquire necessary defensive weaponry to form a solid national defense force,” which means buying more arms from the US, which Beijing has repeatedly condemned.
The new president said his government would “enter consultations with mainland China over Taiwan’s international space and a possible cross-strait peace accord.”
For years, Beijing has sought, with considerable success, to block Taiwan’s entry to the UN and other global organizations and to establish normal diplomatic relations with other nations.
A peace accord between Taipei and Beijing would require Beijing to recognize the government in Taiwan, at least tacitly, as being legitimate.
Ma said: “Taiwan doesn’t just want security and prosperity. It wants dignity.”
Beijing has shown no inkling that it would be willing to accord the stature and dignity Ma seeks.
Perhaps the only element in Ma’s speech that Beijing might applaud was his commitment that Taiwan would not declare formal independence while he was president.
Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) and his comrades in Beijing might consider Ma’s comments on democracy a bit of a taunt: “Taiwan is the sole ethnic Chinese society to complete a second democratic turnover of power.”
“By succeeding,” he said, “we can make unparalleled contributions to the democratic development of all ethnic Chinese communities.”
Chinese leaders have often asserted that democracy, with its elections, unfettered press and other freedoms, has no place in rising China.
At home, Ma, who was born in Hong Kong and came to Taiwan as a child, sought to assure his constituents, even those who did not vote for him, that his loyalty was unquestionably to Taiwan.
“Taiwan is not my birthplace, but it is where I was raised and the resting place of my family,” he said. “I will protect Taiwan with all my heart.”
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with