Graphic footage of death and destruction has been shown on China's state-run news networks in the days following the massive earthquake that hit southwest Sichuan Province last week.
Such telling video has rarely been shown by domestic media so extensively and so quickly after a national disaster.
CCTV, China’s state-run TV network, as well as some local TV stations, have interrupted their regular programming to provide 24-hour coverage of the disaster.
Field reporters give live reports of search-and rescue operations. News about China’s deadly earthquake is being updated around the clock — tallying death tolls, the horrendous damage and the government’s swift response.
Footage shows Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) surrounded by grieving villagers, his arms tightly holding two young girls.
“Your sorrow is our sorrow,” he assures them. “As long as people are still alive, we can start all over again.”
Wen traveled to the disaster areas within hours of the massive earthquake. Chinese TV covered his movements while leading rescue operations and comforting people in distress. Wearing a hard hat, he was shown standing on rubble and consoling trapped survivors through a loud speaker. The message is compelling: This disaster is terrible but the government is doing everything it can.
Such swift reaction and extensive news coverage has not been seen in previous disasters. When the great Tangshan earthquake struck 32 years ago, the Chinese media kept the information secret for a long time, even though more than 240,000 people were killed. In the early stages of the 2003 SARS outbreak, domestic media downplayed reports on the deadly epidemic, even as it spiraled out of control and spread globally.
More recently, severe snowstorms hit southern China during Spring Festival, the country’s most important holiday. Local media initially downplayed the crisis, following the government’s cue; Wen was later forced to apologize for the government’s slow response.
With the Beijing Olympics just three months away, China is in the spotlight.
Wenran Jiang (姜聞然), acting director of the Chinese Institute at the University of Alberta, said the country has drawn lessons from its past experiences with disaster.
“China made mistakes before. They seemed to have learned their lessons from the earlier episodes and this one — they probably want to manage it as well as they can,” he said.
Why China’s new approach? Jiang says that “the media follow-up is quite transparent,” in part because it “is politically less sensitive covering such a natural disaster.”
Besides, Chinese officials see tangible benefits in allowing media transparency. By showing the leaders helping people and coordinating search and rescue efforts, he explains: “the result is that the whole [of] China is being mobilized. The disaster has now become a rallying point of the country.”
Experts in the region note the stark contrast between China’s open response in the aftermath of the earthquake and Myanmar’s defensive, clumsy response in the aftermath of a deadly cyclone earlier this month. Unlike its southern neighbor, China appears open to accepting international help and providing accurate information.
Chinese officials say they welcome offers of sympathy and international assistance. Aid groups have been on standby, ready to help as soon as the Chinese government gives the green light. Officials say that will come “when the time is ripe.”
Today’s more open, quick and aggressive reporting is a stark departure from China’s poor performance in recent years.
Li Yunxia wipes away tears as rescue crews dig through the ruins of a kindergarten class that has buried her only child — a five-year-old boy.
Other parents wail as soldiers in blue masks trudge through the mud, hauling bodies from the rubble on stretchers.
“Children were screaming, but I couldn’t hear my son’s voice,” she says, sobbing.
This grim ritual repeated itself on Thursday across southwestern China, as thousands of mothers and fathers awaited news about their sons and daughters.
The grief is compounded in many cases by a Chinese policy that limits most couples to one child, a measure meant to control explosive population growth.
As a result of the one-child policy, the massive earthquake that rocked China last week — already responsible for at least 32,000 deaths — is producing another tragic aftershock:
Not only must thousands of parents suddenly cope with the loss of a child — they must often cope with the loss of their only child.
China’s population minister recently praised the one-child rule, which dates to 1979, saying it has prevented 400 million children from being born.
Some wealthy families ignore the order, have more children and pay a US$1,000 fine. In rural areas — like earthquake-devastated Sichuan Province — families can petition for an additional child, but there’s no guarantee the authorities will approve the request — they usually don’t.
That reality has cast parents like Li into an agonizing limbo — waiting to discover whether their only child is alive or dead.
Thousands of children were in class when the temblor hit on Monday afternoon. Many of their schools collapsed on top of them.
In Dujiangyan City, more than 300 students were feared dead when Juyuan Middle School collapsed with 900 students inside. A similar number died at the city’s Xiang’e Middle School.
Now parents cluster outside collapsed school buildings, held back by soldiers in some cases as rescue crews search for signs of life.
Jaime Florcruz is CNN’s Beijing bureau chief.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with