Giving old buildings a “facelift” by redoing the facade rather than demolishing and rebuilding them has become a fashion of sorts. The result looks like a brand new building, but the old structure remains unchanged.
Chinese President Hu Jintao’s (胡錦濤) five-day “spring warmth” visit to Japan was just such a facelift to the always tense Sino-Japanese relationship. He did not seek resolutions to fundamental problems or existing obstacles in the relationship. Rather, the two countries merely signed their fourth communique on a strategic partnership, pretending that all is well, while in reality the relationship remains turbulent and filled with controversy.
Ever since former Japanese prime minister Junichiro Koizumi stepped down in 2006, a strange top-down phenomenon has occurred in Sino-Japanese relations: Leaders are enthusiastic about the improvements in the relationship, officials are suspicious of it and the public remains cold toward it.
Nevertheless, through their three-stage “ice-breaking,” “thawing” and “spring warmth” visits, the leaderships of the two countries have suddenly become friends, pushing Sino-Japanese relations to new heights. It seems the two leaderships have seen a reversal of their relationship as a shared goal and that they are now eager to maintain warmer relations. For example, former Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe made paying China an ice-breaking visit his first political after taking office and the fourth communique seems to have become the last career achievement of pro-China Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda.
However, their enthusiasm cannot move the public. In comparison with such enthusiasm, officials on both sides are suspicious of each other because of unresolved controversies over Japan’s history textbooks and the oil fields in the East China Sea. The incident with poisoned Chinese dumplings sold to Japan has also damaged the relationship between China and Japan.
In the past, the pro-China faction in the Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs was biased in favor of China and acted like the Red Guard in their promotion of Sino-Japanese relations. From disputes over Japan’s history textbooks to visits by politicians to the Yasukuni shrine, they repeatedly spoke for China and established a joint history textbook committee and an oil field exploitation task force with their Chinese counterparts. They deeply believed that Sino-Japanese relations were going to improve.
However, in the past two years, disagreements over history and obstacles in oil field exploitation have caused doubts as officials on both sides became less optimistic there would be any improvements in the overall relationship as long as issues regarding fundamental interests remain unresolved.
Since the 1990s, despite the fact that Sino-Japanese relations have repeatedly swung back and forth between conflict and cooperation, private sector exchanges continued. But these exchanges have gradually cooled down following several large-scale anti-Japan demonstrations in China in 2005. As a result, the Japanese public developed a sense of insecurity about China and the “cold front” reached a climax when the poisoned dumplings scandal hit, sparking distrust in Chinese products.
Hu’s visit to Japan was the result of mutual political interests. Hu wanted to sign the communique on the strategic partnership to smooth-out any political wrinkles before the Olympic Games in Beijing, while Fukuda wanted to boost his popularity.
However, so long as fundamental issues remain unresolved, any attempts to perform a facelift may prove temporary, just like cherry blossoms in spring.
Tsai Zheng-jia is a research fellow in the Institute of International Relations at National Chengchi University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry