"No famine has ever taken place in the history of the world in a functioning democracy," Amartya Sen once wrote.
This, argued the Nobel-prize winning economist, was because democratically elected governments "have to win elections and face public criticism."
Sen’s words have a grim resonance as Myanmar faces a humanitarian disaster exacerbated by its lack of openness. The military junta began on Sunday by saying that Cyclone Nargis had killed 351 people; a few hours later it was forced to raise that to 4,000 deaths, with another 3,000 missing; by the end of the day government ministers privately admitted the toll could hit 10,000 — and were asking for emergency aid from abroad. And in the middle of this catastrophe — as residents of Yangon, the largest city, scavenged for food — state television showed opera, while the Web site for the military regime’s English-language newspaper, the New Light of Myanamar, had for its lead story: “Senior General Than Shwe welcomes back Prime Minister General Thein Sein on his return from Thailand.”
Even without the dictatorship’s downplaying, assessing the damage wreaked by last weekend’s storm was always going to be tough: power and communications are out across swaths of the country. As it is, the aid organization World Vision thinks that at least 2 million Burmese have been killed, made homeless or otherwise affected.
The damage is likely to be lasting: the Irrawaddy delta, which is now overwhelmed with water, was previously a fertile rice-growing crescent that supported millions. That the regime is now, however cautiously, accepting more aid from outside its usual donor list is itself a sign of the situation’s grimness; this is a marked change from its closed-door policy during the tsunami of 2004 (which did not have anywhere near as large an impact on Myanmar as on its neighbors).
Perhaps it is also an admission that police states do not make efficient rescuers. Already the tardy response of the military is being compared to the ruthlessly efficient way they put down last September’s uprising of Buddhist monks.
As the aid organizations begin their work, some campaigners are already pressing for their efforts to be matched by international pressure on the regime to open up. They have a strong case. After the Saffron revolution was crushed last September, the international outrage stirred afresh by the junta’s thuggishness died away yet again. Other countries — Zimbabwe and Tibet — dominated Western attention.
But any further pressure must be carefully choreographed: it would be naive to imagine that this natural disaster can foster something like Turkey and Greece’s “earthquake diplomacy” of 1999, when the two countries sent rescue teams to each other’s affected areas and established a warmth in relations that can still be felt.
No, what Western aid workers with experience of Myanmar describe is a suspicious apparatus that closely monitors, intimidates and obstructs them. In these circumstances, rushing in with political demands for Senior General Than Shwe and his ruling clique will only succeed in preventing aid reaching ordinary Burmese. This pressure should be put on the government later.
By neglecting the basic human needs of its people, the government has made it far harder for Burma to recover from Nargis. Before the cyclone, the average household spent three-quarters of its budget on food, while fewer than half of all children completed primary school. Yet when a UN agency pointed this out last year its representative in Myanmar was expelled. Even as the country was racked by this storm, the junta pressed ahead with preparations for next weekend’s referendum on a new constitution. These battles will have to come later.
The first task for other countries is to ensure that aid gets to ordinary Burmese, and to offer it unconditionally.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry