When the people of Myanmar vote in a referendum on May 10 on the country’s new constitution, they will be getting a bitter taste of the “discipline-flourishing democracy” the military has in store for them.
The referendum, Myanmar’s third in the past five decades, will theoretically decide the fate of the country’s new charter, a document that promises to cement the dominant role of the military in Myanmar politics following the next general election, planned in 2010.
In fact, the outcome of the referendum is a foregone conclusion, according to veteran Myanmar watchers.
“It’s going to be a ‘yes’ vote,” said Naing Aung Oo, a former Myanmar student activist who was forced to flee the country in the aftermath of the 1988 anti-military protests. “There are two reasons, one is intimidation and the other reason is the high probability of rigging the vote.”
Myanmar’s junta, the self-styled State Peace and Development Council (SPDC), has left little up to free choice in the upcoming referendum.
The generals no doubt learned their lesson from the 1990 election, which, contrary to their expectations and planning, the National League for Democracy (NLD), led by opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi, won by a landslide.
Despite their electoral victory, the NLD was blocked from power on the military’s argument that a new constitution was needed before civilian rule could be risked in Myanmar, a country suffering from a long history of ethnic-based insurgencies and separatist struggles.
The referendum on the constitution, which took 14 years to draft, was announced in February amid intensifying international pressure on Myanmar’s military regime to demonstrate its sincerity in moving toward some form of democratic system. This was in the aftermath of its latest crackdown on its own people in September last year, when the government brutally suppressed protests led by Buddhist monks.
In the same month, but less publicly, the regime also announced a new law that punishes anyone caught publicly criticizing the referendum with a three-year jail term and a fine.
The law has been readily enforced. In March and last month scores of activists have been detained for holding peaceful protests urging a “no” vote in the referendum, including five members of the NLD, who participated in a peaceful protest in Yangon, according to Human Rights Watch.
The New York-based rights group said that conditions for a free and fair referendum on May 10 do not exist because of widespread repression, media censorship, bans on political gatherings, the lack of an independent referendum commission and courts to supervise the vote, and a pervasive climate of fear.
But given the content of the constitution that is being voted on, the nature of this “discipline-flourishing” referendum should come as a surprise to nobody.
Two of the fundamental principles of the military-drafted constitution are to provide a “discipline-flourishing genuine multiparty democracy” and “for the Tatmadaw [military] to be able to participate in the national political leadership role.”
How the military will dominate Myanmar’s post-election politics is clearly spelled out.
Under the draft charter, 110 members of the 440-seat lower house, or People’s Parliament, and 56 members of the 224-seat upper house, or National Parliament, would be selected by the military.
Control of this 25 percent of both houses would effectively bar amendments to the charter that might threaten the military’s dominance, since for an amendment to pass, it would require more than 75 percent support.
The draft constitution also includes restrictions excluding many opposition politicians from running for office and a clause that effectively prevents Suu Kyi from holding any elected office because she is the widow of a foreigner.
The new charter also enshrines the right of Myanmar’s future president, a non-elected post that is likely to be claimed by the commander-in-chief, to seize executive and legislative powers in case of an emergency.
“A military coup could be implemented in Burma by constitutional means,” noted Lian Sakhong, general secretary of the Ethnic National Council, representing the ethnic minority groups in Myanmar opposed to the military.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and