With Taiwan anticipating change with the presidency of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), foreign laborers wishing to switch employers because of factory closures, sexual harassment or abuse can wait no longer. The rash decision by the Council of Labor Affairs (CLA) to deregulate the “3D” industries — dirty, difficult and dangerous — has meant that many foreign laborers have chosen to run away and become illegal fugitives after waiting in vain for new employers.
In the past, foreign labor quotas were governed by strict capital and occupational restrictions. Small and medium-sized enterprises wanting to employ foreign labor needed to go through certain procedures, and then apply to local employment service stations to hire foreign laborers who were awaiting re-employment. When a factory closed, releasing a large number of foreign laborers, companies would fight for every worker.
However, last October the council deregulated the “3D” and the “three shift” industries, where factories run around the clock, so that these two sectors may now apply to bring in new foreign workers to make up 20 percent, 18 percent or 15 percent of their workforce, depending on their level of demand. Once that door opened, labor brokerages — in their own self-interest — began to discourage employers from hiring foreign laborers awaiting re-employment.
For example, on April 9 there were 754 foreign laborers awaiting re-employment, yet there were only 95 openings. The rate of successful matches is less than 10 percent. Foreign laborers who do not get new jobs can only return home in debt or run away. Legal foreign laborers end up being persecuted unlawfully and find themselves unemployed, in debt and in dire straits.
Council Chairman Lu Tien-lin (盧天麟) had served before as chairman of the Taiwan Confederation of Trade Unions.
After less than one year on the job, Lu made the unprecedented move to deregulate the basic wage of 150,000 foreign domestic workers on July 1 last year, raising the amount that could be deducted for room and board from factory and construction worker paychecks to NT$50,000, causing the incomes of these foreign workers to drop drastically.
Last October, Lu deregulated foreign labor quotas for the “3D” and the three shift industries. By March, just five months later, 13,582 more foreign laborers had been brought into the country, while companies showed no interest in hiring those awaiting re-employment.
Even employment service center officials say no companies have registered to re-employ foreign laborers for a long time.
Foreign workers have been forced to leave the country midway through their contracts.
They are already at an absolute disadvantage in disputes with their employers and now been left without bargaining chips, even if they are forced to work overtime before work-related injuries have properly healed, sent to work in restaurants or supermarkets without pay, or work 16 hours a day without overtime compensation.
Despite such serious legal violations, foreign laborers fear that they have little chance to be re-employed and therefore become resigned and endure indignities without protest.
The more foreign laborers are exploited, the fewer opportunities there are for Taiwanese workers. The only party to benefit is immoral employers.
Lu, who claims to have gotten his start in the labor rights movement, has moved Taiwan’s labor policies backwards 10 years by issuing several administrative orders that don’t require legislative scrutiny.
When the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) took power in 2000, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) said the number of foreign laborers would be reduced by 15,000 annually, and that the total number would be kept below 300,000.
After eight years of the DPP, the number of foreign laborers has risen to 365,229, a 20 percent increase.
Lu’s decisions to deregulate the introduction of foreign labor 10 months ago far exceeded decisions by previous council chairmen to reduce labor costs for small and medium-sized enterprises. It also created tens of thousands of unemployed foreign laborers.
Thousands of foreign laborers brought into the country legally lose their jobs every year through no fault of their own. Those who find themselves in this situation now, however, will quickly discover that seeking re-employment is a dead-end street. Running away may become their last resort.
The council’s move to offer a NT$2,000 reward for runaway foreign laborers not only wastes time and money investigating, detaining and deporting these people, but starts a vicious circle. Inappropriate foreign labor policy will cost the entire public and cast shame on Taiwan’s human-rights record.
The DPP has clamored for a return to civil movements after stepping down. However, if those wearing leather shoes wish to return to straw sandals, they must first deal with the mess they created while in power.
Ku Yu-ling is chairwoman of the Taiwan International Workers’ Association.
Translated by Angela Hong
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry