In the past, when the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was mentioned, the image that appeared in people’s heads was that of a party that was honest and local, a party that had the support of many prominent intellectuals who were against the concentration of power in the hands of one party.
From a brand management point of view, these were some enviable brand assets.
After eight years as the ruling party, impressions of corruption, incompetence and extremism are weighing hard on the DPP brand.
These are very lethal brand liabilities. It does not matter if the DPP is really like the manner in which the media has portrayed or not.
The fact is the public has a very bad impression of the party, or else it wouldn’t have lost so badly in the legislative and presidential elections. Under the long-term subtle influence of the media, the DPP’s brand liabilities have for some time now outweighed its brand assets.
The DPP is in need of thorough brand repositioning.
Repositioning does not mean the party has to abandon all its original core values, rather it means removing existing negative impressions that people have in their minds.
Apart from engaging in open and honest self-evaluation, even more importantly, the party must exploit and even create opportunities to improve its image.
The choosing of a new chairperson for the party is an excellent opportunity for the DPP to reposition its image.
Especially because this new chairperson is being picked on the heels of the serious setbacks in the legislative and presidential elections, the person who is chosen will be a representation of how willing the party is to reform itself.
Some of the things that the DPP members should keep in mind when selecting their new chairperson are which of the candidates can improve society’s impression of the DPP and minimize the DPP’s brand liabilities, and who can maximize support from within the party.
A political party is like a product. If you want to sell a product to consumers, you must tailor the product by putting yourself in the consumer’s position.
To really sell something, you have to abandon the arrogant attitude that consumers should buy your product simply because you think it’s good.
The DPP runs the risk of choosing a chairperson based only on whether the candidates can maximize support within the party. This often gets mixed up with too many private interests. In this situation, there’s a danger of compromising too much and straying from the ideals in the process.
The DPP has already been nearly suffocated by its brand liabilities.
If all the talk about reform turns out to be no more than empty words, and no real action is taken, it will be impossible for the public to adopt a fresh and new image of the party, let alone be inspired.
Candidates Koo Kwang-ming (辜寬敏), Chai Trong-rong (蔡同榮) and Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) are all very talented individuals. Whoever wins will not necessarily be better or worse than the other candidates. Rather, the race will be decided by considering the expectations of society and who can minimize the DPP’s brand liabilities.
The DPP is standing at a historical crossroads: It will either slowly start to steer toward success, or it can continue its steep descent.
The next chairperson will more than ever symbolize the DPP’s desire to reform.
Liu Shun-ming has an MSc degree in Public Policy and Management from Carnegie Mellon University.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under