As the presidential debates were being held in Taiwan, Singapore was giving its people a NT$40 billion (US$1.3 billion) bonus, the Hong Kong government was asking itself what to do with its NT$400 billion surplus and new South Korean President Lee Myung-bak was announcing five new economic goals in the hope of initiating a 60-year period of progress.
Looking at this debate from abroad and in light of the possibility that Taiwan could be removed from the list of Asia's "four tigers," one could be forgiven for feeling a sense of loss.
How can Taiwan's less-than-stellar economic performance be improved? It's a good thing that both presidential candidates have returned to the issue of economic policy and given voters room for rational thought. Perhaps because they were restricted by the scope of the public's questions, their responses during the first debate were rather partial and segmented, lacking in strategic perspective and global vision.
Faced with the enormous potential of the Chinese market and entwined in the complex cross-strait relationship, both candidates have adopted stances that differ from that of President Chen Shui-bian (
The most urgent task for the next president is to prioritize security and prosperity, provide opportunities for Taiwanese industry and pool available resources to quickly develop a foundation for industry and thus create a Taiwanese economic renaissance.
Taiwan's economic future should be a major strategic focus. Rather than debating how many days of chartered flights should be allowed per week, we should rather seek to determine which sectors of industry Taiwan should focus on.
Here is what we are confronted with: The economic health of the information and electronics industries is influenced by the US economy, which has soured of late; the health of the tourism industry is predicated on various circumstances; and the financial services sector is limited by a mess of regulations and policies. As for the cultural industry, it is not yet mature enough to be industrialized.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) said the government should raise the average income, for which investment and spending will be needed. In response, the KMT has put forward the "633" economic policy and the "i-Taiwan 12 Projects."
Democratic Progressive Party presidential candidate Frank Hsieh (
But the government complains it is impoverished, so how can it make investments? If the government has no money, then how can it cut taxes? The average income in Hong Kong is higher than in Taiwan and the highest income taxation rate is 16 percent. No matter how hard it tries, Taiwan's tax cuts will never reach the majority of taxpayers in an M-shaped society.
The Hong Kong government has adapted quickly to new economic realities by redirecting itself toward the financial and logistical industries. Domestic policy has created a convenient transportation system and a cosmopolitan lifestyle. Recently, Hong Kong has become one of the world's three major financial centers, on par with London and New York.
Taiwan has more advantages than Hong Kong: high quality of professional skills, quality of life and a rich cultural foundations. But our election culture is too concerned with mud-slinging and fear-mongering. Perhaps Sunday's presidential debate allows for new hope.
Ted Chiou is a professor in the Department of Public Administration and Policy at National Taipei University.
Translated by Angela Hong
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under