Anyone looking for an example of how not to practice administrative neutrality could do worse than to look to the Taipei City Government.
The city staged an extravagant, six-hour New Year's Eve party in front of Taipei City Hall at a cost of NT$20 million (US$630,900). No doubt, the splendid party, attended by A-list singers and capped by a magnificent fireworks display at Taipei 101, boosted the capital's visibility among global TV viewers.
However, before the countdown started, a "mystery guest" appeared on stage: the Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) presidential hopeful Ma Ying-jeou (
Earlier this month, Ma accompanied Hau in making the rounds to thank city police officers and staffers for working on Lunar New Year's Eve. When asked by the media whether the city government had violated administrative neutrality in inviting Ma, the KMT candidate said he was there in his capacity as "an old friend," and not to canvass votes.
Ma is not the only KMT candidate who has appeared with the mayor. Hau also invited KMT vice presidential candidate Vincent Siew (
It's disturbing that Hau has taken advantage of many of the capital's activities to serve his partisan interests. And Ma, who strongly advocated administrative neutrality during his tenure as Taipei mayor, has fallen short of his own standards once more.
President Chen Shui-bian (
But the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is equally guilty of partisanship. DPP presidential candidate Frank Hsieh (
Such brazen displays of partisanship highlight the lack of a legal precedent to clearly define and enforce administrative neutrality. Maybe neither the candidates nor the officials are to blame, for at the root of the problem is the lack of a law to regulate interaction between candidates, officials and local government-sponsored activities.
With the new legislative session beginning today, what better time -- less than 30 days before the presidential election -- to deliberate and pass an executive proposal on promoting administrative neutrality for civil servants?
That way, when government employees attend press conferences held by political parties and denounce government policies -- as Armaments Bureau Director-General Wu Wei-rong (
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry