If you happen to see National Communications Commission (NCC) Chairman Su Yeong-chin (蘇永欽) -- or any of the other commission members, for that matter -- don't be surprised if they seem to have put on weight. The members of the NCC broke their promise, and now they're eating their own words.
A year and a half ago, the Council of Grand Justices ruled in constitutional interpretation No. 613 that the Organic Act of the National Communications Commission (
Despite this ruling, the grand justices did not rule that the NCC members should resign immediately. It gave them until the end of this year.
Following the ruling, commission members announced they would not wait until then to resign, but rather step down on Jan. 31.
The members said they would endure the humiliation of staying, despite the ruling, just long enough to carry out crucial tasks. They stressed that they would resign on Jan. 31 regardless of whether the organic act had been amended.
Jan. 31 has come and gone. The Organic Act has been amended and the members of the commission have not stepped down.
Su has changed his tune: The commission will stick around until new members have been appointed.
This, Su says, is to ensure a smooth transition in the NCC's work.
Many people say one thing, then do another. The NCC is no exception, but its members -- well-educated academics, led by a law professor -- act like they have done no such thing.
They are staying on only out of dedication to the public, they say. If the public is willing to believe that, they could even stand to improve their reputation through this lie.
Although there will be a short transition period between the terms of this and the next commission if the NCC members resign now, more than 500 civil servants at the NCC will continue work as usual.
This is similar to the Control Yuan, which is operational, despite lacking panel members. The Control Yuan is one of the five government branches designed by Sun Yat-sen (
Of course it would be best to avoid a long transition period between commissions. The Cabinet should nominate new members and the legislature should review them immediately.
The members of the NCC should be ashamed; they have no right to go back on their promise or claim that their staying on is in the public's interest.
Lu Shih-hsiang is an adviser to the Taipei Times.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under