I was surprised to read the paper's editorial on Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou's (馬英九) statements about whether or not he possessed a green card ("Ma's colored leadership card," page 8, Jan. 31). Don't misunderstand: The topic followed nicely on the heels of a news piece you published on the details of this attack strategy by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
Nevertheless, based on your insightful opinions in the past, I had fully expected another take on the issue and had turned to the opinion page partly to confirm that I was right.
Apparently I was wrong.
Instead of reading that DPP presidential candidate Frank Hsieh's (
Instead of reading that possession of a green card does not equate to lack of loyalty to one's country (which Ma also said), I read about Ma's supposed lack of integrity over the matter.
And instead of reading that Hsieh would have been better off championing Indiana's recent legislative support for democratic Taiwan (admittedly my home state), I read about Ma's so-called image manipulation of the press.
Yes, considering my well-placed confidence in the Taipei Times' editorials, I must have been wrong.
Or was I? I have chosen to reside in a foreign country for a number of years and not out of necessity. Does that indicate a lack of respect for my home country? In a word, no. It does say something good about the people of Taiwan, but not about my respect for the US.
Similarly, possession of a green card implies that -- at least at the time of application -- there was probably something good about the US. Most people love their home country even if they are open to opportunities elsewhere and to suggest otherwise without clear evidence is unjustified and ill-conceived.
How surprising is it really that a foreign student in the US would apply for a green card? I fail to feel the shock. Nearly every week I see a net-based ad offering me green card services. Apparently, a lot of people outside the US have at least some interest. Didn't many Taiwanese students studying in the US at the same time as Ma spend at least a few moments considering whether they should spend the time and money to apply?
In the US presidential election, a few people will try to make an issue out of Senator Barack Obama's admitted brief use of an illegal substance, but will most Americans really care? Or will they be more focused on the hostility in Iraq, health care (or the lack thereof) and the economy? Most likely the latter. So it is surprising to me that so much focus is being spent on Ma's reasonable action to exercise his legal right to apply for a green card while living abroad. Horror of horrors! Of course, if it turns out that he failed to disclose this when legally or morally obliged to do so, then that's perhaps another matter -- but far from earth-shaking.
Your editorial does get it right when you insist that politicians should be held to a high standard of integrity. And telling us that Ma claimed to be "scrupulous in separating public funds from private interests" is certainly of interest, considering how easy it is for so many politicians (no "defense" intended) to fail to "avoid giving even an appearance of evil" when it comes to special allowance funds. But that's another horse to beat on a different day -- one that you have beat quite well in the past, and rightfully so.
Nevertheless, I remain open to any new developments that might raise this matter to the level of an actual issue, for I -- like you -- am hopeful that Taiwan will elect a leader that truly cares about integrity and values liberty at least as much as the economy, if not more so. Of course, there's no telling what skeletons may lie in the candidates' closets, but one thing's for sure: If they're there -- and sometimes even if they're not -- motivated individuals will swing the doors wide open to reveal them, for better or worse.
But, for now at least, I'm inclined to believe that former or current possession of a green card is not such an objectionable thing. It is perhaps even admirable. And I hope that the DPP and this newspaper can get back to focusing on better things at this crucial juncture.
Jim Goodpaster
Taipei
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.