The resounding defeat of the indendependence-leaning ruling party in the recent legislative elections must have been profoundly depressing to those who hoped for self-determination for Taiwan.
The defeat may look like a forfeiture of self-determination. However, Taiwanese democracy has survived a very bitter contest between the pro-Taiwan and pro-China groups, without significant civic unrest. Moreover, it has also overcome the subversive threat of China's united front tactics.
As such, Taiwanese should hold their heads up high and treasure the preservation of this most remarkable democracy. The decision of the majority prevailed, and all issues can be resolved by peaceful means.
The extraordinary tolerance shown by the pro-Taiwan group to the anti-democratic provocations by the opposition should not be considered cowardice. Instead, it should be rewarded handsomely in future elections.
The legislative responsibilities of rooting out corruption in the government, reinvigorating the economy and safeguarding Taiwan's sovereignty are now entirely in the hands of the pro-China group. The pro-Taiwan group will be in the driver's seat to oversee the performance of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). A free press and free speech, which had been carefully nurtured by the ruling party during the last eight years, will also scrutinize the promises made by the KMT before the elections.
With a firmly established democracy, it will be impossible for the KMT to resurrect the past autocratic regime. In March, the pro-Taiwan group will have another chance to prove that its relentless pursuit of democracy is most beneficial to all Taiwanese.
Samuel Yang
Bloomfield Hills, Michigan
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with