Criticizing China for not living up to its stated commitments on human rights and press freedom is easy. So easy, in fact, that in some quarters of the international community Beijing seems to elicit something approaching sympathy simply for being under tremendous pressure.
This is even more the case now with the Beijing Olympics on the horizon. And this sympathy can only increase as expressions of genuine excitement among many ordinary Chinese offset the ugly reality of the forced evictions and wild corruption that has accompanied preparations for the Games.
If sympathy is to be directed toward anyone in China, it is these ordinary people, whose pride can be a positive force for not only the image of China that they project to the rest of the world, but also for constructive change to their own country. It is at this level that the Olympics can redeem themselves in the face of government and corporate abuses.
Sadly, this seems to apply less and less to Chinese sportspeople themselves as the Games approach.
Agence France-Presse reported on Wednesday that the Chinese men's soccer team made a public pledge as part of its struggle to advance to the next round of Asia's World Cup qualifiers.
It included this astonishing wording: "I pledge to advance to the World Cup, which is the professional goal that we strive for. We swear by death to kill along the bloody road of defending the honor of the motherland and realize our youthful dreams."
Because this is China, and because China is often not held to the same standard of sportsmanship by international sports authorities, we cannot expect FIFA, the global governing body for soccer, to investigate the matter.
This is noteworthy. For while in isolation the Chinese soccer players come across as insecure and more than a little ridiculous intoning such language, as part of the bigger picture -- in which government expectations/interference and extravagant US$1 million bonuses come into view -- there is reason yet again to be concerned about what it means for Chinese to participate in international tournaments.
Unhappily for the Chinese soccer squad, key matches in the World Cup qualifiers coincide with the lead-up to the Beijing Olympics, which can only increase the pressure on them. Worse, they are in the unofficial "group of death" with three formidable rivals, and only two teams will advance.
Now, after reciting a pledge that would not look out of place in Iran or North Korea, it seems that the Chinese have taken an expression derived from gallows humor rather too seriously.
Of all sports, soccer is the most notorious for the violence that can accompany domestic and international fixtures. But very rarely is this violence a weapon that is directly stoked by national soccer authorities or by governments. It is hoped that this will not change in this case.
But the Chinese team has an unenviable record on the pitch, and its supporters have an equally unenviable reputation for sore losing -- particularly against other Asian teams. With nationalist sentiment growing as August nears, international soccer fans will be witness to a test: Can the Chinese soccer squad conduct itself in a manner more civilized than the public pledges it considers necessary to win matches?
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with