A PLACE GLORIFYING an authoritarian politician in the heart of the capital of a democratic society is an anachronism. After the government changed the name of the Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall to the National Taiwan Democracy Memorial Hall, the conflict shifted to pan-blues and pan-greens fighting about the removal of the characters dazhong zhizheng (
All new democracies with a history of authoritarian rule must find a way to deal with society's conflicting memories.
Transforming "Chiang Kai-shek's [
When politicians say that they want to change a place so laden with political significance, the question that arises is: What thoughts and feelings would this arouse in the public? Are the process and the goals of the changes to touch upon different memories of history and realize a broader vision for the future? How should a place that was built to glorify Chiang be remembered in a democratic era?
Changing "Chiang Kai-shek's Temple" cannot be achieved by a quick erasure of still living memories of the authoritarian era. Wiping out memories is like telling everyone that it's all over, but in the hearts of many people in Taiwan, everything is not over yet. The process of taking down the characters dazhong zhizheng from the memorial's front gate shows that the history and memories of the authoritarian era have not really cleared up.
We have neglected history, and left the history of the authoritarian era to rot in the dark corners of archives, awaiting our understanding and recognition. Because of this, the transformation of the memorial hall, a legal administrative procedure, became nothing more than the violent obliteration of memories.
How should we handle the symbolic transformation of places that have so many sentiments attached to them, when the history of the authoritarian era is not yet cleared up?
When the majority of the public has a real understanding of the history of Chiang and his authoritarian regime on this land, we should have faith that Taiwan will want a more profound memorial landmark. There, through spiritual cleansing, we will be able to see the dignity we had lost, the harm that we had suffered, and in witnessing this pain we will see the hope that we have held on to and the power it generated.
Of course, no public spaces that are associated with conflicting memories of history can avoid political confrontations from opposing interests. Some new democracies, however, are wiser than others, managing to open the Pandora's box of the authoritarian past and make it the first step in the reconstruction of memories in society. Perhaps the form of a memorial space brought forth by a process of democratic dialogue would not be very special, but through the new interpretation bestowed to it, it has a better chance to win the sympathy of the public.
Through civil discussions that will allow the public to gain a clearer perspective on recent history, we may decide that we want to keep the places left over from the authoritarian era -- but give them another layer of meaning. Maybe the bronze statue still standing in the Memorial Hall is important. The sheer size of the statue can remind us once again how this authoritarian government humiliated the people.
The space below the statue could be made into a museum commemorating the many victims of the regime. When we go to the space below the hall, we can feel how this dictatorship suppressed so many innocent young lives.
Perhaps we should leave a symbolic piece of wall standing to commemorate the war and the people who where forced to leave their homes and rely on an authoritarian leader for temporary protection and peace. Perhaps we will rename the memorial square, because protesters have turned the place that used to be the symbolic core of the authoritarian regime into a square for the people who fought for freedom and democracy.
When confronted with the Chiang Kai-shek era, our society experiences conflicts, but can these experiences of spatial transformation act like a mirror, reflecting the thoughts of each visitor who reflects upon the relationship between the individual and this authoritarian history? Plaza de Mayo in Buenos Aires is a place where the military dictatorship that ruled Argentina had oppressed the people, but it is also the site of many popular protests. In the end, the Argentines decided that a place so full of historical significance should not be destroyed and rebuilt, but instead be invested with new layers of significance.
Transforming a memorial space with the goal of giving it a democratic name is meaningless if it is accomplished by an undemocratic process. In a democracy, memories cannot be determined by voting, they must be actively reinterpreted in a dialogue centering on truth, understanding and the people.
If the process of transforming a public space that has a lot of conflicting meaning in modern Taiwanese history is successfully undertaken, the memories it evokes can have a strong appeal to every ethnic group.
I hope that in the future, when we walk into the memorial hall, it can make every one of us, regardless of age, ethnicity or identity, feel that we have the power and the chance to face a future together.
Fan Yun is an assistant professor of sociology at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs