Non-American gangsters
Dear Johnny,
Could you please enlighten me? I watched the amazing film American Gangster, starring Russell Crowe and Denzel Washington, recently in England. It is a true story about the heroin trade in the US in the 1960s and 1970s.
The suppliers of the drug were named as the defeated Chiang Kai-Shek's (
Is this the same group who invaded Taiwan? If so, is this common knowledge in Taiwan?
Were any of them ever brought to justice for helping to flood the US with narcotics during the Vietnam War?
What happened to the surely substantial profits? Is the money used for political funding?
Is it a coincidence that, as my friends inform me, this movie has not been released in Taiwan? If it is, will it be censored?
John Bull
Bilston, UK
PS: I can understand if you cannot publish this. Even if you live in a "democracy."
Johnny replies: Hey, John, it's been a little while since we weren't allowed to watch movies because someone said something disparaging about Peanut. The film opens here at the end of the month, and as far as I know it is uncensored.
To answer your numerous questions: the source of the heroin was the so-called Golden Triangle, the bosses of which had some connections to former soldiers of the Nationalist government who were stranded along the southern Chinese border when the communists won the civil war.
But you can't really say that this was the same group as the KMT that reinvented itself in Taiwan, though there are many here who feel tremendous sadness at the so-called "orphan army" and their often destitute descendants. There are even charities that funnel Chinese-language textbooks and the like to the kids over there.
Brought to justice? Well, the Americans tried to have kingpin Khun Sa extradited, but that came to nought.
And it's news to me if any of the profits from that drug empire helped finance the KMT here in Taiwan. It wouldn't make sense, anyway. The KMT didn't need drug money.
Gloom and doom or bust
Dear Johnny,
I never seem to see business articles extolling the virtues of investing in China. Of course, some know better than that.
However, I am wondering if the Taiwanese government is able to stem the flow of capital from Taiwanese corporations to the mainland.
Is the prevalent economic atmosphere one of gloom and doom? It can't be that bad, can it? Can the people of Taiwan fight it as well?
I wonder if the media and corporations are colluding to create this general perception of "China or bust."
Who would be the most guilty party in the flight of investment to China? After all, a diverse economy is the safest one.
Aaron Cheong
Vancouver
Johnny replies: Sorry, Aaron, but for this debate may I refer you to columnists who have been saying the same thing over and over again for years?
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with