Candidate registration for the legislative elections has ended. Next month's polls will have 296 hopefuls contending for 79 district and Aboriginal seats and 34 at-large seats. Amid the change to single-district elections, competition in many districts will be of unprecedented fierceness.
Legislators are key figures in representative democracy, a position often pursued by the elite of every political party. The problem is, Taiwanese legislators do not have a positive image.
The overall impression of the legislature is not only poor, but it is getting worse. Its ranking in various surveys on public credibility is usually last or second to last.
Taiwan used to have the so-called "10,000 year" legislators, also known as the "old thieves." But the overhaul that downgraded the National Assembly and upgraded the Legislative Yuan not only failed to improve the situation, it earned legislators the title of "monsters." Even the move to reduce the number of legislative seats by half and implement new election policies have not inspired a reformed atmosphere.
Why do legislators rank so poorly in terms of trustworthiness? Whose fault is it? This must be considered in terms of system and behavior. In reality, the legal definition of the functions of the legislature has long been a neglected issue.
For instance, the procedure of ratifying legislation -- including the lack of transparency in the formation and functioning of committees and the negotiation mechanisms between parties -- and reasonable rules of engagement have never been established. This has served to create doubts among those outside the system, who complain about the complete lack of transparency.
Another example is that information about the legislative agenda is not made public, which not only goes against the public's right to know what is going on, but also fosters a tendency among legislators to grandstand during question and answer sessions, in complete opposition to the democratic principles of rational political discourse in the legislature.
An opposition legislator recently insulted a female government official, and then tried to cover up his misbehavior. Imagine, if the debate process were broadcast in its entirety to allow public scrutiny. Wouldn't the behavior of these legislators be much more restrained? They would at least have to think about the image they are projecting to viewers, and perhaps alter their style accordingly.
The legislature should pass the five laws that regulate the Legislative Yuan and associated regulations with all speed, to put an end to lawmakers' conservative, ostrich-like mentality and allow the broadcasting of floor debates to the public.
The legislature's efficiency and level of sophistication can only be elevated by targeting both policy and conduct. Without large-scale reform, voters will become increasingly detached from the political system, believing that the legislature is only capable of acting in its own self-interest with no regard for the public.
Allowing the legislature to continue as it has been would not only make it an embarrassment but also destroy public confidence in democracy.
Ku Chung-hwa is chairman of Citizen Congress Watch.
Translated by Angela Hong
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations