IN EVERY ELECTION,identification with Taiwan is a subject that touches a nerve in every ethnic group, so much so that it has become a political doctrine in itself. Because of the long-term animosity between political parties in Taiwan, the guileless supporters of these factions are often construed as being either entirely blue or green.
To make matters worse, news media get involved and deliberately stir up animosity, so that Taiwanese society is torn up into mutually exclusive, opposing camps of blue and green. This can be considered a great tragedy in the development of Taiwanese democracy.
For instance, identifying with the policies and ideology of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is considered a shortcut to identifying with Taiwan, as though the DPP is the "key to Taiwan," with the right to define and direct what it means to identify with the country.
Legally and logically, there is no foundation for this notion. In the end, it is the public rather than the parties themselves who determine whether the parties live or die. The fact that people identify with the land and the country is a matter of naturally ordained right.
However, the many evils committed by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in its 50-year reign remain unaddressed. Although they are now relegated to the position of the opposition party, the KMT still retains ill-gotten party assets, and has yet to undergo a transition into justice. Much resentment is still buried in the hearts of family and friends of unavenged victims of the regime.
Unable to comprehend the need to acknowledge their guilt and demonstrate genuine remorse, the KMT has recently been using the rather feudal slogan of "win back Taiwan." It is difficult to see how this can win the hearts of the public. Rather, it makes those who previously suffered under KMT rule feel that the power of the party-state is attempting to reinstate its rule, and the threat of a revival of the specter of "black gold" politics looms.
Compared with the DPP's lack of administrative ability, the KMT's actions are like demons and this instills fear in our hearts. From this we know that the public despises the KMT above all else. This shadow attacks whenever elections loom, and should never be underestimated.
Recently, men who were forced to join the KMT against their will have variously defected, drawing a line between themselves and the party, thereby severing all ties. Various professors have declared their association with the KMT as the greatest stain of their lives during talk-show appearances. Others profess the enormity of their shame through confessionary articles in newspapers. The majority scold the KMT in private.
The KMT brought this upon itself like digging its own cesspool when it chose to disclose its old records of membership. Even presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (
Of course, there are some who question why it is necessary to always criticize the KMT when the DPP has imitated its poor example and likewise suffered a host of corruption scandals during its reign -- after all, the DPP is not much better. These individuals are not aware that the DPP is protected by its grassroots image: unless it becomes corrupt from within and self-castrates, the DPP will remain the unimpeachable weeble of Taiwanese politics.
If the KMT remains obstinately adherent to error -- being incapable of truly immersing itself in and identifying with and integrating with Taiwan, choosing rather to flirt with the despotically communist China -- then the KMT will find it difficult to get even a firm footing in Taiwan, let alone anything more.
Even former president Chiang Ching-kuo (
In other words, identifying with Taiwan is not the same as party affiliation. Rather, the four major ethnic groups must be allowed to freely elect their party of choice and decide which should rule and which should be in opposition. This would be the true meaning of democratic governance.
Moreover, China makes no distinctions between Mainlanders, Hoklo or Hakka, considering all to be "Taiwanese compatriots." Why would anyone be inclined to harbor lingering affection for such an essentialized "motherland?"
French President Nicolas Sarkozy is of Hungarian descent. In a touching presidential campaign speech, he emphasized the importance of respect, tolerance, kindness, diversity, fairness, justice, happiness and the future of the country. French voters were deeply moved, and the knots of ethnic difference were dissolved into nothing. The impact of his speech can still be felt today.
Can Taiwan's political parties and politicians follow this wise example?
Lu I-ming is a former publisher of the Taiwan Shin Sheng Daily News.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under