According to recent reports by the Chinese-language China Times, 43 percent of youths find the term "Strawberry Generation" unacceptable. This result concurs with surveys I conducted in university lectures. Even if some students accept the label, most do so only conditionally.
After embellishment by mass media, "Strawberry Generation" is not only equated with "Seventh Graders," as in those born between 1981 and 1990, but also imbued with pejorative connotations such as having low resistance to stress, being losers, or belonging to the "Moonlight Tribe" -- or those who spend a month's salary before month's end. Yet, one kind of rice feeds a hundred different characters, which means even with similar life experiences, these youths remain unique, individual entities.
Unfortunately, for purposes of convenient manipulation and marketing, the mass media have simplified the richness of the generation's identity. At the same time, it creates an inflexible and derogatory prejudice against a social group.
This situation is not exclusive to "Seventh Graders." Marching into middle age, the "Fifth Graders" -- those born between 1961 and 1970 -- were likewise branded "Generation X" in their youth.
At the time, the media characterized Generation X as hedonistic consumers lacking responsibility and confidence and without definitive life goals. This formulation is no different from what the "Strawberry Generation" represents today.
Paradoxically, those who brand the nation's youths "Seventh Graders" are the "Generation X" of old. This strange designation and interpretation demonstrate not only a generation gap, but the discrepancy in authority between "Fifth Graders" and "Seventh Graders."
Other than being stereotyped the "Strawberry Generation," "Seventh Graders," another stereotypical label, are youths who don't care about public affairs. Are young people today really less civic minded?
Even during the mid-80s, when social movements were in full swing, or during the Wild Lily Student Movement, students who devoted themselves to public affairs had always been in the minority. And yet, the social reform efforts of today's students recall a lot of the passion from the days of the Wild Lily Student Movement. For example, many professors and students contributed to the campaign to preserve Lo Sheng Sanatorium in April.
Youths involved in the Lo Sheng Republic of Human Rights and Cultural Rights and the Youth Labor Union 95, as well as others who commit themselves to causes such as the community, labor relations, gender equality, education, culture, equality and anti-globalization have already become Taiwan's new force of reform.
Unlike previous generations of student movements, they do not have star student leaders and do not place the responsibility of social reform in the hands of political parties. Conversely, they see the falseness of blue vs. green politics. The spearhead of reform is no longer directed at turning the political table, but rooted in social change.
This type of civic participation differs from joining the China Youth Corps, religious missions or other organizations in that it stresses social reform on a policy level and displays a new social force through concrete resistance and the commitment to work. This attitude and spirit are outside the simple label of "Strawberry Generation."
Even so, those who devote themselves to social reform are still in the minority. Every generation faces different challenges. But the attitudes and abilities with which each generation meets challenges are limited by the era's political, economic and cultural factors.
For instance, in an authoritarian age, avoiding politics is a common family injunction. Events, including the 228 Incident, the White Terror era and other experiences under a highly oppressive rule can lead to a deliberate rejection of politics based on fear. But why is the number of young people who are willing to participate in politics still low despite the fact that society has liberalized?
In reality, before students enter university, many of their life goals have already been predetermined by the status quo. From an early age, competitive academic advancement imbued with pressures of achievement and success has narrowed our field of vision and restricted the goals toward which we strive.
In recent years, higher education costs and the commodification of education have not only affected the quality of education, but deprived students of opportunities to pursue knowledge, understand society and participate in public affairs.
Many students pass university entrance exams only to cram their schedules with an unhealthy amount of work that leaves them with neither money nor knowledge. This phenomenon is especially apparent in private schools.
Under student recruitment competition, new departments opened by universities are increasingly geared toward practical subjects. Meanwhile, career counseling and job fairs prior to graduation often invite large corporations rather than non-governmental organizations or public organizations to serve as references for future employment. Thus university education becomes increasingly profit-driven, channeled toward marketing and commodification, providing less cultural and intellectual thought and deterring contact with different social groups and values.
Perhaps this is the reason why fewer youths are active in public affairs.
Kuan Chung-hsiang is chairman of Media Watch and associate professor in the Department of Radio, Television and Film at Shih Hsin University.
Translated by Angela Hong
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under