Near the St. Peter's Church in Leiden in the Netherlands there is a "historical spot" that is an ancient execution ground. A plate there shows an execution scene. A judge is overseeing the execution, and the executioner is lifting his axe, about to behead the convict. The scene is very similar to executions in ancient China and elsewhere.
There is also a Spanish picture of a mass execution of Protestants in the 16th century. It showed a harrowing scene: In the foreground were people who had been beheaded, while a group of people further away had been hanged. At the right were religious leaders ordering the army to arrest a group of people. It was clear they were to continue the punishments. This picture shows how cruel and vicious state-sanctioned killing is.
At the side of a pond near the Dutch Parliament in The Hague stands a statue of Johan van Oldebarnevelt. Van Oldebarnevelt was an important figure in the establishment of the Dutch Republic.
This man is very interesting because for almost 30 years he facilitated talks between the various Dutch provinces to help establish the Netherlands as a sovereign country, thus making an important contribution to the establishment of the Dutch Republic.
He was also an important player in the establishment of the Dutch East India Company (VOC), but in 1619 he was sentenced to death for the crime of high treason.
Van Oldebarnevelt's death was the result of a conflict that was both political and religious. He was rather tolerant when it came to religion, but was killed because he was not tolerant enough.
Seeing his statue in The Hague makes people feel that in the end, finally he has received some sort of justice. But it is still difficult to understand how someone who was so important in establishing the Netherlands as a sovereign country could have been sentenced to death by the same government he helped create.
During World War II, the Netherlands was occupied by Germany and many Dutch were killed. After the war, the death penalty -- which had been abolished in 1870 -- was temporarily reinstated especially to punish people who had collaborated with the German invaders, and thousands or people were arrested.
Of the 152 people that were sentenced to death, only 39 were actually executed as Queen Juliana pardoned many of the convicts.
The unfair killing of an old politician like van Oldebarnevelt was officially sanctioned by the state and the people who were sentenced to death for betraying their country during the war were a final example of the Netherland's sanctioned killing.
Especially after World War II, when the help these people had given to the Nazis resulted in the death of so many of their compatriots, it makes sense that the state wanted to kill them in accordance with the law.
The Netherlands is just one example of country with a history of state-sanctioned killing which has created untold bitterness and pain in the country. All countries in the EU have a similar history of such cruelty and inhumanity.
With such a historical background, we should pay attention to an EU representative who last month called on Taiwan to abolish its death penalty.
The UN has also passed a resolution calling on all countries to do so. As Taiwan is actively trying to join the UN, it should move in accordance with the UN and abolish the death penalty.
Chiu Hei-yuan is a professor at Leiden University.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under