When it comes to Taiwan's upcoming presidential election, the candidate-centered campaign is often the focal point. But ironically it seems not be the case this time -- especially with respect to the governing Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
Recent efforts made by DPP presidential candidate Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) to walk out of President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) shadow and wage his own campaign against Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) have illustrated an essential need for Hsieh's camp to reorientate the focus of the election.
The most salient point in case was Hsieh's recent proposal to further open cross-strait trade. He suggested a wider opening to global capital, including investment from China; an amnesty to facilitate the return of capital previously remitted out of the country via underground or illegal channels; a lowering of taxes on inherited property and gifts to below 10 percent to encourage the wealthy to keep their money in Taiwan; and an increase to the 40 percent ceiling on investment in China on a case-by-case basis.
It appeared that Hsieh's new ideas contradicted Chen's -- namely, the policy of "proactive management and effective opening." Chen immediate reiterated his position that the 40 percent cap will not be charged during the reminder of his term.
Although Hsieh and Chen dismissed speculation that they were at odds over cross-strait economic policies and stuck to the consensus of letting Chen handle state affairs and Hsieh handle campaign strategies, Hsieh has no doubt ignited a political fire storm by trying to distinguish himself from Chen.
Particularly when Hsieh said: "Although there are things that [Chen] hasn't done -- or hasn't done quite right -- I will do them [right] and this is the reason for electing a new president. I believe he will accept my proposals."
This comment displayed the DPP candidate's determination to establish his own policies.
To a large extent, Hsieh successfully distracted the media from issues such as Chen's promotion of a referendum for UN membership using the name "Taiwan," growing public dissatisfaction with rising food and oil prices and the unification or independence debate.
Ma has continued to use the "economy card," calling for direct links and wider trade between Taiwan and China.
Hsieh's strategy is to marginalize his differences with Ma.
Since Ma has criticized the DPP government for focusing more on national identity issues than on the economy, what Hsieh has tried to do is strike a balance between Ma and Chen by promoting the idea that improving the economy and safeguarding national identity must go hand in hand.
Since Hsieh's campaign has been overshadowed by Chen's political maneuvering on sovereignty and referendum issues, not to mention Chen's appointment as the DPP chairman, Hsieh can regain the political spotlight by presenting a somewhat different attitude toward Chen's existing policies.
Bold initiatives may attract more median voters, but they also invite internal risks in terms of how to coordinate with the president and the Executive Yuan on key policies.
With only four months to the election, Hsieh desperately needs to create his own campaign strategy by re-framing the debate, rebuilding his image and resetting his agenda. Hsieh may not necessarily have to disassociate himself from Chen, but he will have to clearly tell the voters why he can do a better job than the previous DPP president.
For example, there is an apparent lack of internal coordination between Hsieh, Chen and the Executive Yuan on how the DPP should articulate the management of the current surge in oil and consumer prices.
Regarding investment from China and how it should be regulated, Hsieh argued that industries related to national defense, agriculture and people's livelihoods should be protected. The key issue is not whether to manage investment, but how to manage it.
Hsieh could have consulted Chen or the Executive Yuan before he tested the waters. If he had, the KMT could not have taken advantage of a DPP split.
To ensure a sound and healthy working relationship in the next four months, more communication and coordination are needed between DPP headquarters and Hsieh's campaign center.
Chen must lower his voice and give the spotlight to Hsieh.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.