I was enlightened by the many historical facts presented in your article "Chiang Kai-shek turned the nation into an orphan" (Nov. 1, page 4). It made me realize it is such a pity that Taiwanese schoolchildren and the general public are so unaware of Taiwanese history since World War II and have been intentionally misinformed by their leaders.
We need more history classes in schools that teach the facts since WWII, so that voters can make informed decisions and come to their own conclusions.
I get quite upset whenever I read in the newspaper that Taiwan and China split in 1949 after a civil war.
The Republic of China (ROC) was sent to Taiwan to accept the surrender of Japan, and to this day, Taiwan still remains a former Japanese colony whose disposition after World War II has never been determined. Both the pan-blue and pan-green camps are misleading people when they declare that Taiwan is part of China or that Taiwan is an independent, sovereign nation.
As for the pan-blue camp, Taiwan could have become part of China if the US had carried out its promises outlined in the Cairo and Potsdam declarations. But that was never done through a treaty.
To counter the pan-green argument, Taiwan has the potential to become a sovereign nation through the actions of the global community. But presently, Taiwan is not sovereign and independent. If Chiang Kai-shek (
In a Top Secret telegram to Washington sent on Nov. 30, 1971, shortly after the ROC lost its UN seat, US ambassador to Taiwan Walter McConaughy stated how ROC Foreign vice-Minister Yang Hsi-kun (
"The declaration should prescribe a new designation for the government here, namely the Chinese Republic of Taiwan," he said.
The term "Chinese" did not have any political connotations but was used merely as a generic term stemming from the Chinese ethnic origin of the populace on Taiwan. It would be used in a way similar to the manner in which the various Arab countries use "Arab" in their official governmental titles.
Since this information is not taught in schools, people should read about it at the National Central Library, which has a set of books titled Foreign Relations of the United States and a set of microfiche of historical documents from the US National Archives made available via Lexus-Nexus.
Alfred Tsai
Taipei
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry