Last week a military police captain serving as a security guard in the presidential residence killed himself while on duty. The cause of the suicide is still being investigated. Since President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and his family members were all in the building when the incident occurred, it sent shockwaves through the Presidential Office and the National Security Bureau (NSB).
After the incident, many people focused on the reason for the suicide. Since the case involved a death and occurred in the presidential residence, a comprehensive and thorough investigation needs to be conducted.
At age 27, the military officer was still young, and working at the presidential residence, he supposedly should have had a promising career ahead of him. Moreover, the fact that the officer chose to kill himself while on duty hints of a connection to the national security establishment and how it is managed -- the national security mechanism.
The investigation into the case therefore must not overlook the security gaps exposed by the incident. Since the security of the president equals the security of the nation, any mistake could lead to national unrest. Thus, no gaps in security can be tolerated. Whatever the cause of the suicide, we cannot disregard the existing problems in the national security system.
After thorough analysis of the related information, it would seem that this case exposes at least three serious gaps in the national security mechanism.
First are the gaps in the sentry duty system.
The president and his family were in the residence when the suicide occurred which immediately creating a gap in the system and a problem for the safety of the president and his family members.
Although we do not know whether the security system instantly filled the hole or whether the security organization instantly adjusted the security management to ensure safety, it can be easily seen from the following that a security problem continues to exist.
There were gaps in risk management after the incident. In theory, there should be a quick response after an incident occurs. Yet media reports said the officer wasn't immediately sent to the hospital, and that the president, the command center and the internal organizations had inconsistent interpretations of the incident, especially regarding the reasons for the suicide.
This gap and inconsistency could lead not only to low morale among security guards but could also have an impact on security. The main point is that this incident exposes organizational disorder and gaps in the crisis management mechanism.
Having looked at the gaps in the national security mechanism, how should the situation be improved? Some legislators have suggested that the NSB should immediately evaluate the mental health of all security guards serving in key postings such as at the presidential and vice presidential residences and workplaces, especially for those armed bodyguards and security guards working close to the president and vice president. Any guards with issues or who have been employed through connections or just to fill a vacancy should all be retrained.
However, the government should spend some time examining the presidential security system and reviewing problems in organizational management rather than focusing on individuals and trying to root out guards who may have mental problems.
Focusing on the guards would only make them feel like there's something wrong with them and would further undermine their morale or dignity.
The proper way of dealing with this is to establish strict mechanisms for the selection, supervision, management, consulting, guidance, assistance and training for the security guards. We must address these gaps in the national security mechanism.
Yang Yung-nane is a professor at the Department of Political Science and vice dean of the College of Social Sciences at Cheng Kung University.
Translated by Ted Yang
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry