Wednesday was the birthday of Chiang Kai-shek (
Mainlander politicians and media criticize the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) removal of Chiang symbolism, but the DPP is actually making Taiwan into a normal country. If we were to celebrate the birthday of every president, Taiwan would set some kind of record.
Some Mainlander conservatives want to commemorate Chiang's birthday exclusively to turn Chiang into a demigod, while the DPP prefers to treat him as a mere mortal.
The political base of many in the pan-blue camp is attached to Mainlander conservatives who distort history to make Chiang look like a great man.
But Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) needs more than the votes of conservative Mainlanders to secure the presidency.
He is therefore campaigning for more support from ethnic Taiwanese, as his "long stay" program shows. But he should be aware that in the eyes of ethnic Taiwanese, Chiang was a dictator and a murderer.
If Ma can understand that giving up a few conservative votes could give him many others, he would bring himself much closer to the presidency.
And when it comes to political networks, the DPP lags far behind the KMT. Economic problems have also had a big impact on the DPP. Although the economy's hiccups have not been its fault, voters will still hold the ruling party responsible, which will complicate its presidential campaign.
But the powers of the old KMT are Ma's burden. Unfortunately for Ma, he doesn't seem to understand this and he cannot free himself. On the one hand he embraces conservative Mainlander forces, while on the other he is still trying to win support in the localization camp.
In the eyes of many ethnic Taiwanese, a politician loses credibility if he embraces Chiang, but Ma continues to do so, and in this way he is actually helping the campaign of DPP presidential candidate Frank Hsieh (謝長廷).
When the government canceled celebrations for Chiang's birthday this year, Ma went out of his way to defend Chiang and thus his hold on the Mainlander vote. He said historical figures had merits and shortcomings, but that Chiang had made important contributions to Taiwan through the restoration, development and preservation of the island, and that it would be a good thing to commemorate him.
Ma's words were far from the truth. After World War II, Taiwan went from occupation by one foreign country to occupation by another. How can this be called "restoration"? Foreign regimes consider themselves above the people they rule, and that is what Chiang's regime did, and compounded the problem by committing ethnic discrimination.
Like the Japanese before them, the KMT that occupied Taiwan was a colonial regime. Chiang did not restore Taiwan; he occupied it.
When Chiang arrived, he came from a backward place. He did not develop Taiwan. Instead he took credit for the efforts of the Japanese administration.
Ma's statement that Chiang "preserved" Taiwan is even more preposterous. If the KMT had not come, it would have disappeared from the face of the Earth, and Taiwan would not have missed it. A more correct statement would be to say that Taiwan preserved Chiang Kai-shek.
Chen Mao-hsiung is an electrical engineering professor at National Sun Yat-sen University and head of the Association for the Promotion of Taiwan's Security.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing