Around the time of the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) 15th National Congress in 1997, an unusual atmosphere arose within China. This had to do with the intensifying the policy of "reform and opening," and promoting the benefits of globalization.
The publishing world could let a hundred flowers bloom, selling books with capitalistic and even democratic leanings.
By the time of the 16th party congress in 2002, this atmosphere was still there.
With Chinese President Hu Jintao's (
But what happened was the opposite of what people had hoped. It turned out that the ones in the gold-rimmed glasses aren't always the good guys: After Hu and Wen had come to power, they left less and less space for freedom of speech.
This was done under the idea of "creating a harmonious society." Harmony was to be achieved by forcing critics to keep their mouths shut, with the notion that if there were little criticism, society could be harmonious.
With the start of the 17th party congress last month, people had very low expectations about political reform. Hu's political report to the congress was again a reason to sigh in despair. Hu did not speak of "reform of the political system" anymore. Instead, he talked about a "socialist democracy." He also dug up the long-forgotten concepts of "one central task, two basic points"and "four basic principles."
The four basic principles are keeping to the socialist road and upholding the dictatorship of the proletariat, the leadership of the Communist Party, and the promotion of Marxist-Leninist-Maoist thought.
From such content, it looks like any changes in the system are all in the small details, and they only allow more freedom in areas that had already been relaxed at the time of the 15th party congress.
In the election of the members of the Central Committee, only 8 percent of the candidates were eliminated. The meeting of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress was still closed, and no questions could be asked. The situation has reverted to that at the time of the 13th party congress in 1987.
The media had been given the good tiding that the 17th party congress would be more open to the media. But, as it turned out, they were only fed small morsels of news and insignificant information. Before the 17th party congress started, China already drew the line for the media as to what they could write about.
This is a clear indication that the control China exercises over the media is getting more sophisticated. The government tries to win the media over by giving them something they want, but at the same time it gets an ever tighter grip on them, as if it wants to insist on the "four basic principles."
If China gains an ever tighter hold on its media, any hope for political reform by the government will be lost.
Some people say that the reforms that former Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) promoted were a "minimalizing of political reform," but at least Jiang talked about reform of the political system and not so much about the "four basic principles."
By comparison, the group of leaders that Hu now leads not only exercises tight control over the media and freedom of speech, it is not even willing to put "reform of the political system" in the title of their political report.
It looks like Hu is even less likely than Jiang to put such a policy into effect. Not only did he confine the reforms to the Cabinet, he also plans to reform only small details and implement reforms in the name of the "four basic principles."
Apart from the fact that he did not repeat the phrase that China should "not copy the model of the Western political system," Hu did not show he had any reason or real intention to promote political reform. But according to the logic of some Taiwanese academics, who say that "the ones with the gold-rimmed glasses are the good guys," that Hu didn't reject copying the Western model is probably enough reason to continue to expect him to push for political reform.
Li To-tzu is a doctoral student at Tsing-Hua University's Institute of Sociology.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry