I have read many of the letters published in the Taipei Times. Understandably, most of these concern the future of Taiwan as an independent nation.
Like most other contributors, I passionately believe in Taiwan's right to self-determination as a sovereign republic that is recognized by all other countries, embraced by the international community and free from Chinese intimidation.
However, I notice that many letters are based on academic analysis and historical interpretations of the cross-strait situation.
While these articles may be interesting to readers, I am doubtful whether it carries any weight or significance to Taiwan's current predicament.
Despite what politicians would have us believe, decisions are based on realpolitik, not ideological notions.
The limitations of international law and institutions also need to be recognized; the former is largely unenforceable, while the latter will never be truly independent and powerful entities while they are controlled by powerful nations for their own benefit.
Once we accept the reality of this, however disillusioning and unjust it is, can we concentrate on what can be done. Change is inevitable, and even if Taiwan isn't currently in control of its own destiny, we should be considering potential future events and scenarios, and discussing how these would effect Taiwan.
For example, what would be the ramifications of China's economy collapsing? If its miraculous growth continues, but disparities between rich and poor widen, leading to civil unrest and the collapse of the Communist Party, could Taiwan take advantage of such an opportunity to declare independence? What would happen if the US becomes isolationist again or enters into a collision course with a China seeking to end its dominance as the pre-eminent world superpower?
Taiwan should therefore also consider how best to prepare itself for future change.
As Gandhi once said, "Be the change you want to see in the world."
Taiwan has achieved an incredible amount in a relatively short time as a fledgling democracy, of which it should be suitably proud. I would still urge its people to strive for a fairer society and to learn from the mistakes of other (allegedly) mature democracies.
Philip Wallbridge
Rochester, England
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this