Sun, Oct 28, 2007 News Editorials 487943015 visits
 Photo News
 More Editorials
 More IELTS
 Johnny Neihu
  • Back Issue

  •   << >>   Full List

  • TaipeiTimes
  •   Subscribe
  •   Advertise
  •   Employment
  •   FAQ
  •   About Us
  •   Contact Us
  •   Copyright
  • Search Most Read Story Most Viewed Photo
     Print
     Mail
     wiki links

    Letters: Political bias and objectivity



    Sunday, Oct 28, 2007, Page 8

    Most teenagers are probably ignorant of political issues, such as China's "Anti-Secession" Law and the arms procurement budget, and hedge on these issues. They detest politics because they think it is a filthy game manipulated by the rich and the powerful. Many also assume that politicians are unscrupulous and tend to make radical, biased comments.

    Some people think that young people's political apathy stems from their disdain for politicians. But is the lack of interest really due to their negative impression of politicians? Many teenagers criticize gossip, but still relish it.

    Some people also think that teenagers' political apathy comes from the perception that their opinions do not matter and will not affect government policymaking. They contend that teenagers steer clear of political discussions because of a feeling of powerlessness. But while students do not have power to change school policy, they can be very vocal in criticizing the policy if it threatens their rights.

    I believe many youngsters eschew political discussions because they are insensible to and have little knowledge of political issues. They are incapable of judging political issues or contributing ideas because they do not have a perspective on these issues. Not knowing how to form an opinion or judge a political issue, they choose to escape politics altogether.

    Many youngsters say they don't have any political beliefs, claiming that it will influence their judgment on political issues and people will consider them biased. In Taiwan, people who voice their political beliefs openly, are quickly categorized as belonging to the pan-green or pan-blue camp.

    When a person criticizes a party, people seldom really think about the comment itself but are eager to know which side the person stands for. Some teachers and parents teach their children not to give voice to their political inclination lest they be called biased. They believe that people who do not have a strong political stand are more accepting of public opinion and can judge political issues more objectively based on facts. But does taking a stand really make a person subjective and biased? Holding an opinion allows a person to develop a personal stand on issues. It forces people to think and to develop insight.

    The public tends to put their trust in people who are said to be objective. But what constitutes objectivity? Many think that a person who does not clearly favor any party is objective and thus makes comments based on facts and is not swayed by personal beliefs and feelings. However, there is the risk that a public commentator might be expressing an opinion that caters more to public taste rather than the truth. Pandering to the public is risky, as public opinion can be easily manipulated by the mass media or certain influential organizations.

    Chang Jung-sheng

    Tainan


    This story has been viewed 292 times.

  • Advertising