Most teenagers are probably ignorant of political issues, such as China's "Anti-Secession" Law and the arms procurement budget, and hedge on these issues. They detest politics because they think it is a filthy game manipulated by the rich and the powerful. Many also assume that politicians are unscrupulous and tend to make radical, biased comments.
Some people think that young people's political apathy stems from their disdain for politicians. But is the lack of interest really due to their negative impression of politicians? Many teenagers criticize gossip, but still relish it.
Some people also think that teenagers' political apathy comes from the perception that their opinions do not matter and will not affect government policymaking. They contend that teenagers steer clear of political discussions because of a feeling of powerlessness. But while students do not have power to change school policy, they can be very vocal in criticizing the policy if it threatens their rights.
I believe many youngsters eschew political discussions because they are insensible to and have little knowledge of political issues. They are incapable of judging political issues or contributing ideas because they do not have a perspective on these issues. Not knowing how to form an opinion or judge a political issue, they choose to escape politics altogether.
Many youngsters say they don't have any political beliefs, claiming that it will influence their judgment on political issues and people will consider them biased. In Taiwan, people who voice their political beliefs openly, are quickly categorized as belonging to the pan-green or pan-blue camp.
When a person criticizes a party, people seldom really think about the comment itself but are eager to know which side the person stands for. Some teachers and parents teach their children not to give voice to their political inclination lest they be called biased. They believe that people who do not have a strong political stand are more accepting of public opinion and can judge political issues more objectively based on facts. But does taking a stand really make a person subjective and biased? Holding an opinion allows a person to develop a personal stand on issues. It forces people to think and to develop insight.
The public tends to put their trust in people who are said to be objective. But what constitutes objectivity? Many think that a person who does not clearly favor any party is objective and thus makes comments based on facts and is not swayed by personal beliefs and feelings. However, there is the risk that a public commentator might be expressing an opinion that caters more to public taste rather than the truth. Pandering to the public is risky, as public opinion can be easily manipulated by the mass media or certain influential organizations.
Chang Jung-sheng
Tainan
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations