On Wednesday, Broadcasting Corporation of China (BCC) chairman Jaw Shaw-kong (
Jaw claimed he left the BCC because of government pressure, saying that although the National Communications Commission approved the deal, it was annulled by the Cabinet; the Ministry of Economic Affairs did not agree to management changes; the Financial Supervisory Commission checked the company books; the Fair Trade Commission used monopoly concerns to send a letter to more than 200 TV stations causing them to complain to Jaw; and the Criminal Investigation Bureau investigated it.
But Jaw is wrong. The BCC is an inappropriately obtained asset -- just like other assets with unclear ownership that ordinary people would not buy to avoid trouble. Most know that the KMT government gave the BCC its special frequency allotments and that the land where many of the BCC's broadcasting and relay stations stand is national land given to the company by the government. This example of the KMT's direct access to the national treasury is the reason the ownership of much of the BCC's land is being disputed in court.
It is because of these problems that the KMT wanted to dispose of companies such as the BCC, Central Motion Pictures Corp (CMPC) and the China Television Co. Jaw wanted to gain control of BCC frequencies and land at low cost in a bid to dominate the broadcasting industry, and then complained of government intervention when he had to give up his holding.
The KMT was aware of the difficulties it would encounter and therefore sold Hua Hsia -- which owns the three companies -- to Jungli Investment Co and placed Jungli in a Hua Hsia-managed trust. The deal was complex and trod on toes, leading to a number of incidents such as the gun shots fired outside the office of KMT Legislator and CMPC chairman Alex Tsai (
Many KMT assets have been inappropriately obtained and should not be sold. The government has pursued these assets for quite some time, but because the KMT refuses to return them and is accelerating their sale, the issue remains unresolved. A political solution would be for the government to publish information on how the assets were obtained and then put public pressure on the KMT by holding a referendum on the return of the assets in tandem with legislative elections in January.
Although reclaiming these assets through the courts requires time and money, the government must continue trying to do so because a court decision will have a snowball effect; a verdict can be used as a reference in similar cases and influence the way the public views the issue, which in turn will affect the way they vote in a referendum. The way to solving the stolen assets issue lies in a mixture of politics and justice.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry