The semiannual meetings of the world's leading finance and banking officials are predictable in at least one sense: Europeans and Americans often use them to lecture leaders of poor countries about the need to modernize their capital markets, promote transparency and adhere to sound investment standards.
What a difference a subprime mortgage crisis can make. Now developing countries are lecturing the West.
With hundreds of officials and experts convening over the weekend in Washington, the theme this year was not fear of protesters, but of the global impact of the troubles in the US housing sector, with many delegates faulting lax regulations and sleepy overseers in Europe and the US.
"Allow me to point out the irony of this situation," Brazilian Finance Minister Guido Mantega said to reporters, contending that the "countries that were references of good governance, of standards and codes for the financial systems" were now the same countries where financial problems were threatening to wreck global prosperity.
In an interview, South African Finance Minister Trevor Manuel said: "If one looks at the impact of the subprime crisis in the US, the losers are poor citizens who tend to be black and Hispanic. But it is also the large banks with an international profile in Europe and the United States that have taken a beating."
"It is clear that there was regulatory and supervisory failure," he said.
The finance ministers and central bank governors from around the world spent the weekend discussing the market turbulence brought on by the credit crisis, declaring in a statement that they would continue to "analyze the nature of the disturbances and consider lessons to be learned and actions needed."
But for many, the lessons were already clear.
warning signs
They said that Western regulators had ignored warning signs, Western banks had used exotic off-the-books "conduits" to buy and sell dubious mortgage products, Western rating agencies had gone along for the ride -- and now the whole world was suffering from Western excesses.
Usually these meetings echo the old debates of what used to be called the north-south dialogue, in which the prosperous countries come to the rescue of the struggling poor countries.
A few hundred protesters in Washington this weekend shouted slogans about exploitation by the wealthy. Along with protesters, of course, were closed streets, police barricades and limousines idling at many downtown hotels.
There was also finger-pointing, and perhaps schadenfreude, discernible in the statement of the G24 group of poor countries led by finance ministers of Argentina, Syria and the Congo, who noted that "developing countries are a new driving force as well as a stabilizing factor in the world economy."
Like the other ministers from what used to be called the Third World, they cited the advanced countries' regulations and their lack of transparency as causes for the mess.
These countries are united in demanding more weight for themselves on the board of directors of the IMF and the World Bank.
In response to all this lecturing, US Secretary of the Treasury Henry Paulson and his top aides fanned out at meeting after meeting to assure the finance ministers that although the impact of the market turmoil has yet to be fully understood or felt, there was no need to panic because the fundamentals of the US economy are sound.
"We recognize that there are some issues in the system that need to be addressed," said Clay Lowery, an assistant Treasury secretary for international affairs, cautioning against quick remedies that might be counterproductive.
"We want to make sure that there isn't a rush to judgment," he said.
Robert Steel, a Treasury undersecretary for domestic finance, told audiences how Treasury had worked with banks to create a new superfund aimed at loosening the credit markets.
"The technical organization of this solution is complex," he told the Institute for International Finance (IIF), a global association of banks, insurance companies and other institutions.
"Initial progress is being made by the lead banks and participation is expected to broaden in the weeks ahead," he said.
But many listeners were doubtful. Manuel noted that the new fund had already gotten a skeptical response in speeches this weekend by former Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan and Michel Camdessus, former head of the IMF.
SKEPTICISM
Josef Ackermann, chairman of Deutsche Bank, also expressed skepticism in an interview.
"It would be premature to make a firm judgment, as not all details have been made known to us," he said, speaking for the board of the IIF.
Paulson and Steel told audiences that the US had already set up advisory panels on auditing and regulations in the financial services industry. But their emphasis was on the industry itself setting up new codes of "best practices," and not on government regulations.
"We're making progress, and working our way through the turmoil of capital markets," Paulson said after meeting with finance ministers from Europe, Canada and Japan.
"We've got a ways to go. But we can all come together and say how we can learn from some of the mistakes and make some corrections," he said.
Developing countries were not alone in giving a cold reception to the idea of voluntary action.
Many European delegates were skeptical of the Bush administration's tack on the issue, which parallels its call for voluntary measures to regulate hedge funds and "sovereign wealth funds," the government funds run by China, Russia and oil-exporting countries that have begun to invest heavily in the West.
"We can't say this crisis was totally unexpected, but we didn't anticipate how this turmoil would happen," European Commissioner for Economic and Monetary Policy Joaquin Almunia said during an interview.
"We may need to adopt some new regulations, but right now our emphasis is on diagnosing the problem," he said.
Much of the anger among developing countries was focused on the IMF, which along with the World Bank was the host of the Washington meetings.
The fund, which makes emergency loans to bail out countries threatened with insolvency, is widely detested in the developing world because of its stringent austerity programs imposed as a price for its bailouts.
Asian and Latin American countries rescued in the 1990s, many of them now healthy because of their exports, have paid off their loans to the fund but are still smarting from the lectures they got and the tax increases they were forced to adopt.
The G24 developing countries offered a stinging rebuke to the fund, lecturing it for in effect dropping the ball while banks in the West invested recklessly in subprime mortgages using lending facilities that were off their balance sheets.
Fund officials were also defensive on that unusual rebuke.
Rodrigo de Rato, the departing managing director of the fund and a former finance minister of Spain, said it was unfair to castigate his organization for laxity.
Pulling out a paper issued by the fund last April, he said it proved "we were already clearly stating our concerns" about the situation.
Indeed, the paper did warn that "the subprime segment of the US housing market is showing signs of credit quality deterioration" and that the problem could "deepen and spread to other markets."
Additional reporting by Edmund Andrew
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations