Now that Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Frank Hsieh (
Hsieh wants to engage Ma on ideological matters: the name of the country, the UN referendum and so on. Little wonder that Ma turned him down, saying that ordinary people are more concerned about the economy. There's a lot of truth in this, but Ma should not underestimate the role of ideology in a presidential election.
Still, Ma is intelligent enough to know when he is at a disadvantage, and he must be conscious that harping on about the glory of the Republic of China and the magnificence of the Chiang family has dwindling currency among most of the people he needs to get into the voting stations. Hsieh would love to have Ma paint himself as the last KMT hardliner and thus look ridiculous. Fat chance -- for now.
With a lack of substantial debate to test the candidates' mettle, voters once again must turn to their personal characteristics. And it must be said: Neither man has scrubbed up very well of late.
Hsieh's disappearing act over the last few weeks has been not so much a display of bizarre behavior on his part -- though it is that -- as an indictment of the DPP's ability to rally around the party flag when it is in the interests of everyone in the party to do so.
We have been told that Hsieh's disappearance resulted from injury or from stress, or both, but we have also been told that Hsieh's brief hibernation was the result of being gored by former DPP chairman Yu Shyi-kun in a battle over the party's "normal country" resolution.
None of this vaudeville lends Hsieh or his party minders any credibility. An ankle injury does not incapacitate a man for two weeks, let alone a budding president. And if stress over an ideological battle as superficial as a party resolution is enough to send the party's presidential hopeful to ground -- leaving even his own supporters speechless -- then we can only wonder what effect a presidency will have on him.
When Hsieh ran for Taipei mayor so that the party could save face in an unwinnable election, election watchers were intrigued by his solid support, stealing an embarrassing number of votes from the pan-blue camp.
Even so, his campaign was tired, cynical and lazy. President Chen Shui-bian (
Meanwhile, Ma is doing his level best to impress "deep blue" supporters with statements of such ludicrousness and offensiveness that it is hard to see how he could mend fences with his foes if he became president. Ma's pleasant manner and smiling face are looking a lot less pleasant and a lot more exhausted. There is a manifest lack of sincerity in a lot of his pronouncements, and this could undo the KMT ticket, because there are very few people in the rest of this ossifying party of mercenaries who can appeal to voters across the blue-green divide.
Both candidates seem to be stuck in a race to the bottom in the credibility stakes. If either cares to stop, take a good look around and understand what makes a convincing president tick and attract support, then the Presidential Office will beckon.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with