Recent reports show that about 20 national museums and cultural centers under the Ministry of Education were demoted and lost their title as "national" institutions. This has caused alarm among personnel at these organizations as the demotion meant the loss of independence and the right to appoint staff.
While some may think these institutions were demoted because of serious wrongdoing, the reality is that it was all done in the name of "reorganization."
Ten of the demoted institutions have been transferred to the Council for Cultural Affairs for governance. Strangely enough, the council plans to double its size -- from three departments to six -- presumably to handle the new institutions under its care.
This change brings to mind the way the ministry carries out annual evaluations of junior colleges and vocational high schools. Based on these, it decides which schools can expand their classes, which must accept less students and which must close. Accepting less students means a demotion, while expanding classes is a promotion. Why can't this same approach be applied to the streamlining of museums and cultural centers?
The National Central Library and the National Science and Technology Museum managed to keep their status as "national" institutions. But what mechanism was used to decide which institutions should be promoted or demoted?
Some reports have said that an institution with more than 300 employees qualifies. But having a large number of staff hardly counts as a valid criterion.
Having a clear mechanism for evaluating a museum or cultural center's status can also be useful in other ways. For example, the National Museum of History has arranged for an exhibition of rare treasures from abroad. The foreign party only agreed to lend its treasures after ascertaining that the museum really was a national institution.
And if one were to judge a museum's status by its achievements, a look at some recent exhibitions would reveal some disappointments. Take, for example, the Taipei Fine Arts Museum. One of its recent exhibitions, "Dirty Yoga," was deemed a success by the Taipei City Government and described in a local magazine as one of the best exhibitions last year.
However, an inquiry by National Taiwan Normal University revealed that the exhibition cost NT$22 million and attracted 133,766 visitors, placing the average cost per visitor at NT$164. With the entrance fee costing only NT$30, the city government had to pay a subsidy of NT$134 per visitor.
What is clearly needed is a fair mechanism to make official evaluations. Unfortunately, as one newspaper report said: "This kind of annual review in the art world should be done by the Council for Cultural Affairs." It's a pity it isn't.
So, before reducing the tasks of the education ministry and expanding the council's, it would be prudent, a priori, to determine what the public wants.
Public impression of the council is limited to the belief that it is an institution that has produced many museum directors and published a lot of books.
However, even this latter function has been criticized on the YLib Web site, which said the council's publications value quantity over quality and that all of them were outsourced.
We are still awaiting an investigation by the Research, Development and Evaluation Commission on this issue. Only then can a decision be made on what institutions should be reduced or expanded.
Lu Ching-fu is a professor in the Institute of Fashion and Communication Design at Shih Chien University.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs