The debate about conflicting and overlapping aspects of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) versions of a referendum for UN membership for Taiwan shows that this democracy has reached a turning point.
Taiwan is facing many old problems and new challenges: a chaotic constitutional system, a weak civic society, the frustrations of a difficult economic transition, a divided national identity and the threats of a strong external enemy. They pose a severe challenge to the survival of a new democracy.
It is particularly worrying that the presidential election campaign is throwing this democracy into turmoil and slowing momentum for development. At this time, Taiwan needs a new impetus for democratic reform and systemic innovation to break the political deadlock and resolve a crisis in governance. The situation is adding extra significance to the referendum debate.
The issue should be looked at in terms of deepening democracy, but this does not mean that it lacks the urgency of other practical issues. Practical implementation of referendums is based in urgent political, economic and social issues.
One example is how the debate on UN membership has become an important catalyst for making the public actively look at the issue from a democratic perspective.
In regard to creating a breakthrough over Taiwan's international isolation, there is different logic in the DPP's referendum -- suggesting that Taiwan join the UN -- and the KMT's referendum, which suggests that it return to the organization as "Republic of China" or something similar.
But there is strategic convergence between the two camps caused by electoral pressures: Taiwan's international space is now the main issue in the presidential election. This convergence of strategies is also resulting in a public consensus that transcends party lines on the issue of UN membership. Taiwan is no longer an international "troublemaker," but a victim of discrimination and unreasonable treatment.
In using a bottom-up process like the public signature drives, the referendum initiatives have served to strengthen civic society. This kind of practical process should also be used to push for an amendment to the Referendum Act (公投法).
In addition to electoral considerations, the initiation of referendums should be seen as civic society's mechanism to organize itself and build a systemic link between it and the political sector. As long as enough signatures can be collected, any citizen can initiate public debate and a determination on issues he or she considers important.
Such referendums provide a new force in mobilizing support for interests ranging from breaking out of international isolation and forging a new constitution to community awareness and cultural movements. This would create public debate and improve democratic understanding in the general public, thus arriving at a deliberative democracy that would foster civic awareness and proactive participation.
In strengthening the boundaries of democracy, the use of the referendum would, in the long term, also strengthen public sovereignty and protect national security. Faced with the Chinese threat, the institution of the referendum would guarantee that Taiwanese had the right to say "no" to China, and would highlight the illegitimacy of Chinese Communist Party rule.
With either referendum -- to "join" the UN or "return" to it -- Taiwan will further define itself as a democratic community and declare to the international community that it is an independent and sovereign state.
Hsu Yung-ming is an assistant professor in the Department of Political Science at Soochow University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and