I've always stressed the importance of reciprocal Taiwan-US student exchange programs to my colleagues and fellow academics in Taiwan, so, no matter what, it is good news that Taoyuan County and the University of Texas at Dallas recently signed an agreement to exchange up to 50 students per year.
Yet, what annoys me about the deal is the way Taoyuan County decided to pitch their program using a familiar China-centric formula. In a newspaper report that followed the Sept. 11 signing of the agreement, Taoyuan County Commissioner Chu Li-lun (
Pardon me, Mr Commissioner, but shouldn't we be saying that Taiwan is a great place to come to learn about Taiwanese -- not Chinese -- culture?
The county's attitude is frustrating to me as an educator in Taiwan, because I often see Taiwanese people who appear to be ashamed of their own (Taiwanese) culture, yet very proud of being "Chinese" (even though most have never set foot in China). To them, Taiwanese culture doesn't exist. For instance, my students are shocked and a little embarrassed when I tell them there are actually lots of young people in other countries who are interested specifically in Taiwan, and Taiwanese culture.
In Japan, these people are called "Taiwanophiles" -- counterparts of Taiwan's own "Japanophiles" -- teenagers and adults who are interested in and crave knowledge about Taiwan and its unique local culture.
Judging from the local blogosphere and numerous Internet forums on Taiwanese culture subjects, in Singapore and Hong Kong (and even in China) there are numerous young people who adore Taiwanese popular music, television and fashion. And, of course, in the US too there are many US-Born Taiwanese who'd like to know more about life in Taiwan. Many of these young people and students might be more eager to come here to learn something about Taiwanese culture -- if, that is, our government representatives would stop promoting it as a form of culture tourism into Old China.
Perhaps Chu and other officials in charge of promoting Taiwan's international student exchanges should themselves be required to pass an "Introduction to Taiwanese Culture" course (now offered at many universities in Taiwan) -- or, at least be supplied with up-to-date, post-1987, maps of their country. They should at least be required to learn that Taiwan has not been a part of so-called Chinese culture for quite some time, and actually has a unique and fascinating culture all its own -- and it's nothing to be ashamed of!
Besides which, even if one could make the case that Taiwan "is Chinese" (because the KMT dictatorship controlled Taiwan as if it were China), why on earth would today's foreign students want to come to Taiwan to learn about it? At best, it would be a watered down, twice removed Chinese culture. In fact, it would be a "Chinese culture" that had long since been absorbed into the fabric of what we ordinarily call Taiwanese culture, wouldn't it?
Ron Judy
Taoyuan County
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with