At least for purposes of public consumption, southern Africa's political leaders continue to stand by Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe, despite his country's ever-deepening economic crisis, which is directly attributable to his tyrannical rule. Indeed, years of economic mismanagement have produced an unemployment rate of 80 percent, with annual inflation nearing 5,000 percent.
Though Zimbabwe was once known as "the breadbasket of Africa," many of its citizens now go hungry and depend on international food donations for survival. About 3,000 people flee the country every day, often risking their lives when crossing the crocodile-infested Limpopo River -- celebrated in Kipling's tale of How the Elephant Got Its Trunk -- and scaling a border fence to enter South Africa.
By now, emigration is more than 3 million, about a quarter of the population. Yet when Mugabe was introduced at the most recent meeting of the Southern African Development Community (SADC) in Zambia's capital, Lusaka, his fellow heads of state heartily applauded him.
There are reports that, behind the scenes, things are different. South African President Thabo Mbeki is said to be trying to negotiate a way for Mugabe to leave the scene. Yet there have been similar rumors before and it is difficult to know whether Mbeki and the other southern African leaders are finally willing to tell Mugabe that he must go. Up to now, paying their respects to him as a revolutionary leader and catering to his megalomania has been more important to them than alleviating the suffering of Zimbabweans.
The obvious way for Mugabe to leave at age 83 would be to announce that he has changed his mind about running again in the presidential election scheduled for next March. Of course, should Mugabe stand down, a fair election next March probably would not be possible. The political opposition would have little capacity to organize an effective campaign in an environment in which Mugabe has shut down independent media, rewritten electoral rules and used the police to pummel -- literally -- his adversaries.
So a period of transition would be required for a proper election to be organized under the auspices of the SADC, with support from the African Union, Europe and the US, in order to get a fair result and launch a recovery process. Yet, given the brief period that remains until the scheduled election, an announcement is required soon if a fair result is to be achieved and a recovery process launched to halt the country's slide into chaos.
A big factor in any timetable for Zimbabwe's rescue is Mbeki's tenure. He has just over a year-and-a-half to go to complete his second and final five-year term. In certain respects, he has been a success. Under his leadership, South African's multiracial democracy has been consolidated, and, in dramatic contrast to Zimbabwe, its economy is flourishing.
Yet Mbeki's achievement is severely marred by two failures. Domestically, his poor performance in addressing South Africa's HIV/AIDS epidemic will ensure that he is judged harshly. Internationally, his record is stained by his lack of leadership up to now in dealing with Zimbabwe.
Nevertheless, even at this late date, Mbeki has a chance to salvage a good part of his reputation by taking the lead in organizing a transition in Zimbabwe. But, given the amount of time a transition will take, he must act now.
Even when a transition does take place in Zimbabwe, the crisis will not be over. The country has been so devastated by the Mugabe regime that substantial international engagement will be required to put it back on its feet.
For now, however, the SADC should, at long last, tell Mugabe that he must step aside, and it should take responsibility for managing an electoral process whose result Zimbabweans will recognize as fair, thereby providing the legitimacy needed for recovery to begin.
Aryeh Neier is president of the Open Society Institute and a founder of Human Rights Watch.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China