With their abundance of cheap labor, China and other countries have developed massive labor-intensive industries. In response, the world's advanced countries, including Finland, are developing knowledge-based economies. Finland's experience provides a key model for knowledge-based economic development.
In the middle of the 20th century, Finland's major industries were forestry and agriculture, but in the 1990s, after years of effort, the Finnish government finished transforming the economy into one based on information and communication technology (ICT).
The country has since topped almost every international ranking for competitiveness or knowledge-based economies.
However, Finland is not content to rest on its accomplishments. The government has no-ticed the potential threats of the growing "China phenomenon" brought on by globalization and has therefore written a proposal entitled The National Knowledge Society Strategy 2007 -- 2015.
As the proposal states, for Finland to further promote its knowledge-based economy, "the strategic priority has shifted from being a society that utilizes ICT to one that generates knowledge-based growth."
Thus, the nation plans to transform into an "internationally attractive, human-centric and competitive knowledge and service society" that will have "an open society, a good and safe living environment, the opportunity to flexibly combine work, family and leisure time, as well as the continuous development of knowledge."
As a result, the Finnish government has proposed three guidelines: "First, reforming the service sector; second, improving quality of life; third, developing sustainable competitiveness in enterprises."
The experiences of Finland and other European countries in developing knowledge-based economies show that the first stage of the transformation toward becoming a knowledge-based economy is based on the existing industrial structure.
Today, the development of Taiwan's knowledge-based economy is similar to those in northern Europe during their initial stage, as it is mostly based on Taiwan's existing industrial structure.
Since a large part of Taiwan's industry still relies heavily on original equipment manufacturing (OEM), "knowledge" for these industries means improving manufacturing processes and technologies. However, at a time when China and other large developing countries are transforming into knowledge-based economies, development of an OEM-oriented, knowledge-based economy in Taiwan will inevitably face greater challenges in the future.
Taiwan needs new thinking and methods if it wants to transform itself into a real knowledge-based economy.
The comparison with Finland and China can yield ideas and inspiration when implementing knowledge-based economic development. By directing and planning the development of its knowledge-based strategies, Finland has not only been able to take the competitive lead worldwide on a macroscopic level, but it has also given its people a high sense of happiness.
In the next phase, the development of Taiwan's knowledge-based economy must connect with the nation's own characteristics and aim for excellent standards of living to develop a knowledge-based economy that makes people happy. Facing the challenges of globalization and the China phenomenon, we must find new ways of thinking to construct a knowledge-based economy with Taiwanese features, humanism, creativity and competitiveness.
Lu Chun-wei is a doctoral student in the Department of Political Science at National Taiwan University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under