Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairman Yu Shyi-kun has said that the party's "Normal Country Resolution" is meant to restrain DPP presidential candidate Frank Hsieh (謝長廷), who says that there is "a constitutional one China" and that this must be respected. There are quite a few people who feel that Hsieh should be controlled, not because he is pro-unification, but because they doubt his resolve to work for the nation's independence.
Because the road to independence is full of obstacles and cannot be accomplished immediately, we must pragmatically promote it in accordance with consistent objectives. But it is difficult to to strike a balance between these "consistent objectives" and "pragmatic promotion," and that is at the center in the dispute over the Normal Country Resolution.
Regarding political party systems, the US soft "broker party" system means there are no platforms, but only the policy platforms created during presidential elections. The mission-based, rigid social democratic parties in western Europe, however, promote distributive justice while protecting productivity and democracy. Giving considerations to long-term convictions, pragmatic policies and promotional strategies causes political problems.
When the DPP was established, it roughly followed the example of European parties with both a basic platform and an action platform. In 1999, then-presidential candidate Chen Shui-bian (
The political importance of the resolution was kept ambiguous, but it was basically placed somewhere between an action and a campaign platform.
In 2000, Chen made the "four noes" pledge in his first inauguration address, which was lambasted by DPP legislators. In order to stay in power, Chen proposed amending the party charter, allowing him to serve as party chairman.
Hsieh said at the time that the Taiwan Independence Clause had been replaced based on principle that newer legislation surpasses older legislation. This move accommodated Chen but resulted in a confusion in the party's policy structure. In addition to my opposition to the proposal, I also withdrew from the DPP National Congress, but the resolution still passed.
Without doubt, the DPP's concession then is key to the recent dispute over the "Normal Country Resolution." If the amended resolution isn't passed at the party's National Congress while the Taiwan Independence Clause has become an inactive old regulation, the party will have lost its ultimate values.
On the other hand, if the congress passes the resolution, it will give Hsieh a core policy to observe for his electoral platform and future administration to bypass the party's internal policy hierarchy.
Additionally, the confusion of this system means that the resolution will have to fulfill too many functions on different levels. With the uneven quality of the resolution, matching a mishmash of different regulations will become the resolution's main characteristic.
If the DPP doesn't clarify the distinction between the strategical arrangement of the party platform -- ultimate goals, mid-term goals and short-term promotion, there will be more disputes in the future.
Not only will the "Normal Country Resolution" be source of these disputes, but I'm afraid that every major election will generate a new resolution. In the long run, a mass of resolutions will pile up and the party's values and structure will become a total mess.
Lin Cho-shui is a former DPP legislator.
Translated by Ted Yang
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs