Today's ongoing financial market turmoil comes as no surprise to those who have been warning about the risks to the world economy from the end of the housing market bubble in the US. Back in January, the UN's outlook for the global economy raised concerns about the economic pain this might impose on heavily indebted US households. It also emphasized how weakly regulated, closely interconnected global financial markets, together with persistent global macroeconomic imbalances, jeopardize growth and development prospects in the world economy, including poorer countries.
The US current account deficit has been the most widely discussed indicator of global imbalances. For the past five years, the US has been sucking in more than US$2 billion a day of other countries' savings, as the easy provision of domestic credit on an unprecedented scale has allowed households to spend more than they earn. Such borrowing was especially attractive as asset (housing and equity) prices kept rising, interest rates remained low and succeeding generations of financial market innovators could convince investors that they had mastered the exigencies of risk. Thus, further lending, even against over-valued collateral, was "sold" as a sign of good times ahead.
Warnings about irrational market exuberance were largely ignored, especially as US consumer spending helped fuel strong growth across the global economy. Robust exports from Japan and Europe supported economic recovery and steadied investor confidence, providing, in turn, further export opportunities for newly industrializing countries, most notably China.
Meanwhile, heightened international competition kept the lid on inflation and interest rates remained low, giving a further boost to consumer spending and completing what looked like a virtuous growth circle. Even many of the poorest countries seemed, at long last, to be joining in, posting strong growth on the back of rising energy and raw material prices, renewed mining investments from abroad and increasing fiscal revenues.
Winning formula
Although the numbers were never as rosy as market enthusiasts seemed to think, they did divert attention away from the shaky foundations of the newfound prosperity. The growing need for measures to correct global imbalances was met with disbelief by influential policymakers and market analysts alike: "Why change a winning formula?"
The fate of the rest of the world depends on the responses to the unfolding financial turmoil. The contraction of property and stock markets will undoubtedly dampen US household borrowing and demand, potentially triggering a downward spiral. If protection is sought through tariff and other trade-related measures, then the knock-on effects could have even more devastating consequences for everybody.
In recent weeks, leading central bankers have injected more than US$300 billion into the financial system, lowered the rates at which they lend to private banks and announced that such activism will continue until calm returns. This may be enough to calm financial markets for now, but it will not redress the more fundamental problems behind the current turmoil. In today's interdependent world, a coordinated strategy is needed to avoid recession and to return lasting stability to financial markets.
Indeed, the fact that the world is again worrying about the economic fallout from financial shocks highlights the lack of progress since the Asian crisis a decade ago in moving toward a new international financial architecture. While there has been some progress on harmonizing standards and extending surveillance, there has been far too much emphasis on strengthening governance in developing countries and not enough on systemic problems linked to unregulated private capital flows.
Recession threat
With the imminent threat of global recession, austerity measures are not the way to correct global imbalances. Rather, deficit countries need to export their way back to balance, while imports should increase in surplus countries. Moreover, productive investments are needed in the poorest countries to resume or sustain economic development.
Policymakers need the fiscal and monetary space to move in this direction. Institutionalizing a mechanism for broad-based international economic surveillance and policy coordination will be an important longer-term goal, but at this point, world leaders urgently need to rebalance global demand and improve the management of the exchange-rate system.
Moving forward requires all governments to act through inclusive multilateral organizations and arrangements. Despite the IMF's undemocratic and corporate-like governance, which has undermined its legitimacy and credibility in the developing world and distorted efforts to extend its surveillance role, there is no alternative multilateral body available.
Such a coordinated response will need to address immediate short-term problems as well as provide medium-term solutions without plunging the world economy into another painful recession. And it is imperative that this time around, reforms offer a lasting solution to global imbalances and tackle head on the most unruly elements of international financial capital.
Jomo Kwame Sundaram is assistant secretary-general for economic development in the UN department of economic and social affairs. Rob Vos is director of the UN department of economic development's policy and analysis division.
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry
Taiwan is the master of its own fate, yet the remnants and values of its colonial past still haunt the nation. The issue is not limited to Taiwan, but rather a phantasm that exists in all postcolonial states. The phenomenon is in apparent in several nations following their independence. Early examples include former Central and South American colonies once ruled by Spain, Portugal and France, and more recently Asian and African nations that gained independence after World War II. The road to democracy is not a smooth one. Most elites in such countries were educated during colonial periods. Once their nation gains independence,