Big shot captains of industry in South Korea who break the law have an ace in the hole: the leniency of their country's appeals court judges.
Two such tycoons -- Chung Mong-koo of Hyundai Motor Co and Kim Seung-youn of Hanwha Group -- within the past week stood before magistrates who suspended their prison terms for, respectively, embezzlement and assault.
In the most recent case on Tuesday, Hanwha's Kim, who runs a chemicals and finance conglomerate, had his 18-month jail term for organizing and taking part in a spectacular revenge beating earlier this year shelved largely as a result of a deterioration in his health.
And last week, Chung, who leads the world's sixth-largest automaker, listened in a packed Seoul courtroom to a judge suspend his three-year sentence, saying the 69-year-old is too vital to the country's economy to spend time in a prison cell.
Experts cited various reasons for the leniency, including the idea among South Korea's judiciary that the chance of a criminal recurrence by the offending executives is slim.
"Absolutely the judge will think there is no possibility they will commit the same crime again," said Hwang Ju-myung, co-founder of Seoul law firm Hwang Mok Park PC and a former judge himself.
In the case of Hyundai's Chung, South Korea's national interest trumped legal reasoning.
"I am also a citizen of the Republic of Korea," Presiding Judge Lee Jae-hong said in court. "I was unwilling to engage in a gamble that would put the nation's economy at risk."
Michael Breen, a longtime resident of South Korea and author of the book The Koreans, said it is hard for the chiefs of the country's economically dominant family run business empires, known as chaebol, to avoid illegal activity in a big business culture characterized by corruption.
"This is in a context where breaking the law is the norm," he said of wrongdoing by the business titans.
Kim's case drew wide attention as, rather than the usual corporate malfeasance, it was centered on headline-grabbing violence.
He was convicted in July of abducting and assaulting off-duty bar workers allegedly involved in an altercation with his son, threatening the victims with an electronic shock device and hitting one with a steel pipe.
Kim Deuk-hwan, the judge who handed down Tuesday's decision, condemned the crime, but cited Kim's health -- Hanwha officials say he has suffered from maladies including depression and insomnia since being jailed -- and the fact that he showed remorse.
But the judge also appeared to show some sympathy, telling the court that the executive "lost his sense of reason because of fatherly love after seeing his son's injuries."
Sparing chaebol chiefs from jail has a precedent.
In 2005, a court suspended a three-year prison term for accounting irregularities handed to Chey Tae-won, CEO and chairman of South Korea's leading oil refiner, SK Corp, now SK Energy.
Breen said the willingness of judges to show leniency can also be found in the idea that going through the humiliation of a trial and prison sentencing is probably punishment enough.
"The spirit of the law has been applied and the letter of the law doesn't need to be applied any further," he said.
Still, they have paid a price.
Both Chung and Kim, 55, were ordered to do community service and even though they escaped lengthy prison sentences, their convictions stand.
And Chung, convicted of embezzling the equivalent of more than US$100 million in company money to set up a slush fund, was told to follow through on a costly promise.
Last year he publicly vowed to donate 1 trillion won (US$1.1 billion) of his personal assets to society as the scandal over which he was eventually convicted was heating up.
Though Hyundai and Hanwha both welcomed the decisions, some in South Korea had bitter words for the country's judges.
"Instead of undoing injustice for the people, the judiciary simply patronizes the public," Hwang Sun, deputy spokesman of South Korea's Democratic Labor Party, said in a statement on his party's Web site.
"We knew that the judiciary was not fair to all, but these verdicts ... have surpassed the unimaginable," he wrote.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under