Taipei played host to the first Taiwan-African Heads of State Summit and the Taiwan-Africa Progressive Partnership Forum this year, and will do so again next year. These two important conferences proposed by President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) are not only an unprecedented undertaking in Taiwan's diplomatic relations with African countries, but also show that Taiwan has real friendship for Africa, and wants to share its democratic values and help it develop.
Meanwhile, Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) keeps insisting that China's overseas development "will not pose any threat to anyone," and Beijing's Foreign Ministry sincerely pledged that "China will never follow the same disastrous road of the Western colonists who bloodily plundered and violated human rights."
However, China has supplied Sudan's dictatorial regime with weapons, and aided the genocide in Darfur for strategic benefits like oil.
In the UN Security Council, China has repeatedly blocked UN peace operations, arguing that it doesn't want to interfere in the internal affairs of another country.
Figures released by the UN High Council for Refugees show that more than 400,000 people had died and more than 3 million had fled their homes in Darfur by last year because UN forces could not come to their aid. China's role as an accomplice in the Darfur humanitarian crisis is now, in the countdown to the Olympics, the issue most often held against Beijing by human rights groups worldwide.
This is not the only time China has aided an African dictator. International sanctions offered an opportunity for the regime of Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe, to be ousted and replaced by the country's democrats, but China supplied Mugabe with economic aid and political support in a bid to gain access to his country's mineral resources.
Now Mugabe not only has enough money to reorganize his army, but he can continue his genocide even more wantonly, protected by China's veto in the Security Council.
At a time when international copper prices have soared to US$8,000 per tonne, China -- which controls most Zambian copper mines and has a monopoly on the sales -- not only does not pay Zambia according to international convention, but continues to exploit Zambian workers and maintain bad working conditions.
In August last year, several Zambian workers were shot while protesting against low wages. The incident was condemned by international labor groups. China's investments mean "sending raw materials out, bringing cheap manufactured goods in," Zambian Chamber of Commerce president Wilfred Collins Wonani said in an interview with the New York Times.
"This isn't progress. It is colonialism," Wonani said.
Such examples of China's colonialist behavior and of Beijing acting like a supreme ruler are seen in all corners of Africa, from Sudan in the north to Zimbabwe in the south, from Somalia in the west to Niger and Togo in the east.
At the end of last year, trade between China and Africa amounted to more than US$40 billion, and it is estimated that in 2010 it will be more than US$100 billion.
But this view of Africa as nothing more than China's overseas mining district or oil field is a classic example of economic colonialism, where the colonizing country takes out raw materials and sells cheap manufactured goods, depriving Africa of all opportunities for development and escaping poverty.
And to further expand its economic monopoly, the Beijing administration abets the actions of dictatorial regimes, causing the already bad human rights situation in Africa to grow even worse, thus delaying the process of democratization and peace in Africa indefinitely.
In the past five years, China has without a doubt become the new main player in Africa, but Beijing's money-grubbing foreign policy is changing an increasing number of African countries' view of China and making them wonder if it has become a new colonialist power. With its values based in an undemocratic regime, it's not surprising that China is only concerned with raking in as many economic and diplomatic benefits as it can from Africa, and couldn't care less about the deterioration of democracy and human rights. But in the international history of political development, there has never been a country that won long-term allies this way.
The Taiwanese model for managing diplomatic relations is completely different from China's.
It consistently strives to achieve peace, prosperity, equity and justice -- the very founding objectives of the UN.
For many years now, Taiwan has actively promoted freedom, democracy and human rights, which form the mainstream values espoused by the international community.
The successful organizing of the Taiwan-African Heads of State Summit and the Taiwan-Africa Progressive Partnership Forum is not only a model of multi-party cooperation, but also shows that Taiwan earnestly wants to share its democratic values, and takes concrete action with African cooperation in the pursuit of development and happiness.
At this point, we should also give our most sincere support and encouragement to the many diplomats who never abandon their efforts, despite the pressure they face from China.
Chen Chi-mai is deputy secretary-general at the Presidential Office.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry