China spent the greater part of the last century struggling to become a modern nation.
But after so many years spent looking outward and forward, some Chinese are once again looking inward and back -- way back, to the golden age of philosophers like Confucius (
The current rage for things ancient -- known as "national studies fever" -- has led in several cities to a revival of private schools known as si shu (
Contemporary analyses of classic novels have become best sellers, and televised lectures in which professors expound on esoteric areas of Chinese culture and history draw tens of millions of viewers.
But perhaps the most conspicuous symbol of national-studies fever is the continuing popularity of Yu Dan's Reflections on The Analects, by a professor of media studies at Beijing Normal University, Yu Dan (
The book is based on seven lectures that Yu gave last fall on the popular prime-time television program The Lecture Room. It is a simply written, highly personal interpretation of The Analects, which are commonly attributed to Confucius, but were actually written by his disciples. But it offers a somewhat unorthodox premise: that the purpose of Confucian thought is to explain how to live a happy life in the modern world.
"Nobody should think that the Confucian Analects are so high we can only gaze up to them," the book begins. "Really, The Analects are meant to teach us how to attain spiritual happiness, adjust our daily routines and find our place in modern life."
Yu sifts through The Analects to find quotations and stories that support this quest for personal fulfillment, mixes them with references to Buddhism and Taoism, Hegel and Tagore, and ties everything together with anecdotes from contemporary life. In The Analects, a major text of the Confucian philosophy that dominated (critics would say oppressed) China for most of two millennia, she finds advice for stress reduction, forgiveness, simple living, friendship and achieving one's dreams.
Under her pen, the story in which Confucius tells a student who complains of having no siblings, "if you are a gentleman, all men within the four seas are your brothers," becomes a parable about learning to let go of regrets before they destroy you. Some maxims that are unpalatable in the modern age are ignored, like this one: "Women and people of low birth are hard to handle; if you let them get close, they presume and if you keep them at a distance they resent it."
Yu said in an interview: "Many of the things in the more than 2,000-year-old Analects are not suited to today's society. Not everything in The Analects is good, but some of it is. I look at it objectively and then highlight some of the things that are good. For instance, I teach people to emphasize the positive things in their lives, not the negative things."
Yu attributes the tremendous popularity of her work and of national studies in general to historical factors -- since traditional thought was criticized for so many years, there is genuine interest in rediscovering it -- and to the stresses of life in modern China.
"When I was young, in the 1960s and 1970s, we didn't have many choices," she said. "You never changed your job, or your house -- and whoever thought of going abroad? Poverty brought stability; there were no inequalities. But now it is different; there are many gaps and people are unsettled. They want to find a way to live a less anxious life."
Some have accused Yu of dumbing down the intellectual legacy of China's greatest philosophical school, and creating a kind of Confucian chicken soup for the modern Chinese soul. Such criticisms leave her unfazed.
"I have a right to speak, and they have a right to speak," she said of her critics. "I believe in a diversity of opinions. And my critics have their logic. You have to understand that some of these people have been studying Confucius their whole lives."
People's University in Beijing opened a College of National Studies in 2005 and even erected a statue of Confucius. Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) has made the Confucian concept of a harmonious society a cornerstone of his ruling ideology. But the success of Yu's take on The Analects has caused some observers to question the direction of this trend and encouraged critics to speak out.
Some who have been recently exposed to national studies "tend to place it on a pedestal," the China Daily columnist Raymond Zhou wrote in a June editorial. "In essence they want to revert to the old days," when national studies "was a force of suppression rather than a source of inspiration."
Even Yu said the temperature of national studies was getting too high.
"National studies fever is not good," she said. "You need to have a calm and sincere attitude toward it. We cannot go back to a single culture theory anymore. Chinese culture and Western culture must complement each other."
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under