How the US blundered
When push comes to shove, the US' highly acclaimed democracy-centered foreign policy is only worth a 50 minute pitstop or less.
This is exactly all that President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), the democratically elected president of Taiwan, was allotted after his 10-hour flight from Taiwan stopped to refuel in Anchorage, Alaska, before commencing another eight-hour flight to Honduras on Aug. 21.
In Honduras, Chen held a summit with the nation's Latin American allies.
Normally, without Chinese influence, US administrations would have gladly welcomed visits from Taiwan's democratic leaders and encouraged their pursuit of freedom and democracy.
In recent years, under direct pressure from the Chinese government, the US has yielded to Beijing's tyrannical demands by greatly restricting the visits of elected Taiwanese leaders.
The so-called "transit stop privilege" granted Taiwanese high officials was reduced from a 3-day stay in major cities in 48 states to a 50 minute pit-stop on the tarmac in Anchorage, where the shining glow of Taiwan's vibrant democracy cannot disturb the interactions between the leader of the free world and the dictator of the underworld.
If this trend continues, Taiwanese officials may in future expect nothing more than aerial refueling privileges.
The Anchorage episode is particularly troubling as it was orchestrated less than a month after the US House of Representatives unanimously passed a resolution calling on the Bush administration to lift its restrictions on visits to the US by high-level Taiwanese officials.
The US State Department, heavily bullied by the Chinese, was not pleased with the Taiwanese pursuit of UN membership and the referendum on that issue.
This incident and the criticism by US Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte on Taiwan's proposal to apply for UN membership led people to question whether the US still stands for freedom and democracy, and whether there might not be secret, underhanded dealings between State Department officials and their Chinese counterparts to sacrifice Taiwan's democracy.
Regardless, what happened in Anchorage reflects poorly upon the State Department.
The US administration's ill-treatment of the president of Taiwan to appease the dictators in China is not only an insult to the 23 million Taiwanese, but also disgraces the spirit of freedom and democracy long upheld and prized by the American public.
The State Department's recent actions are clearly anti-democracy and undermine US leadership in the Free World.
The US State Department owes an apology for this despicable mistake to the US House of Representatives and in particular to the people of Taiwan, who still aspire to replicate the freedom and democracy that, among a handful of other countries, the US represents.
Stan Yang
Laguna Hills, California
The limits of truth
The letter by Huang Jei-hsuan did a commendable job showing that Taiwanese have the undeniable right to establish their own country (Letters, Sept. 5, page 8).
Sadly, however, I cannot agree with Huang on one thing: The truth will not set Taiwan free.
True, it can help, but in the end only Taiwanese themselves hold the key to their freedom.
Forty-five years ago I had an opportunity to visit Texas and study its history.
To my amazement, I discovered that Texas once had been an independent country called the Republic of Texas (1835 to 1845).
In 1845, The Republic of Texas concluded negotiations with the US and became its 28th state.
The negotiations were conducted on a state-to-state, equal footing basis.
As a result, Texas was able to retain the right to secede from the union whenever Texans saw fit -- something it did when it broke away and joined the south during the Civil War.
This gives me hope that Taiwanese will one day succeed in establishing a country and join the international community.
Only then can we negotiate with other countries and safeguard our interests. Anything short of that is unconditional surrender.
Tony Chen
Chadds Ford, Pennsylvania
A Canadian alternative
The editorial on the problems Taiwanese companies have run into in China points to a very obvious fact ("We walk on thin ice in China," Sept. 5, page 8).
Bluntly put, my answer to this is, What in hell did you expect?
Instead, I would suggest Taiwan turn to the safest, most democratic and friendly country in the world: Canada.
Don Corrigan
Stoney Creek, Ontario";
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry