How the US blundered
When push comes to shove, the US' highly acclaimed democracy-centered foreign policy is only worth a 50 minute pitstop or less.
This is exactly all that President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), the democratically elected president of Taiwan, was allotted after his 10-hour flight from Taiwan stopped to refuel in Anchorage, Alaska, before commencing another eight-hour flight to Honduras on Aug. 21.
In Honduras, Chen held a summit with the nation's Latin American allies.
Normally, without Chinese influence, US administrations would have gladly welcomed visits from Taiwan's democratic leaders and encouraged their pursuit of freedom and democracy.
In recent years, under direct pressure from the Chinese government, the US has yielded to Beijing's tyrannical demands by greatly restricting the visits of elected Taiwanese leaders.
The so-called "transit stop privilege" granted Taiwanese high officials was reduced from a 3-day stay in major cities in 48 states to a 50 minute pit-stop on the tarmac in Anchorage, where the shining glow of Taiwan's vibrant democracy cannot disturb the interactions between the leader of the free world and the dictator of the underworld.
If this trend continues, Taiwanese officials may in future expect nothing more than aerial refueling privileges.
The Anchorage episode is particularly troubling as it was orchestrated less than a month after the US House of Representatives unanimously passed a resolution calling on the Bush administration to lift its restrictions on visits to the US by high-level Taiwanese officials.
The US State Department, heavily bullied by the Chinese, was not pleased with the Taiwanese pursuit of UN membership and the referendum on that issue.
This incident and the criticism by US Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte on Taiwan's proposal to apply for UN membership led people to question whether the US still stands for freedom and democracy, and whether there might not be secret, underhanded dealings between State Department officials and their Chinese counterparts to sacrifice Taiwan's democracy.
Regardless, what happened in Anchorage reflects poorly upon the State Department.
The US administration's ill-treatment of the president of Taiwan to appease the dictators in China is not only an insult to the 23 million Taiwanese, but also disgraces the spirit of freedom and democracy long upheld and prized by the American public.
The State Department's recent actions are clearly anti-democracy and undermine US leadership in the Free World.
The US State Department owes an apology for this despicable mistake to the US House of Representatives and in particular to the people of Taiwan, who still aspire to replicate the freedom and democracy that, among a handful of other countries, the US represents.
Stan Yang
Laguna Hills, California
The limits of truth
The letter by Huang Jei-hsuan did a commendable job showing that Taiwanese have the undeniable right to establish their own country (Letters, Sept. 5, page 8).
Sadly, however, I cannot agree with Huang on one thing: The truth will not set Taiwan free.
True, it can help, but in the end only Taiwanese themselves hold the key to their freedom.
Forty-five years ago I had an opportunity to visit Texas and study its history.
To my amazement, I discovered that Texas once had been an independent country called the Republic of Texas (1835 to 1845).
In 1845, The Republic of Texas concluded negotiations with the US and became its 28th state.
The negotiations were conducted on a state-to-state, equal footing basis.
As a result, Texas was able to retain the right to secede from the union whenever Texans saw fit -- something it did when it broke away and joined the south during the Civil War.
This gives me hope that Taiwanese will one day succeed in establishing a country and join the international community.
Only then can we negotiate with other countries and safeguard our interests. Anything short of that is unconditional surrender.
Tony Chen
Chadds Ford, Pennsylvania
A Canadian alternative
The editorial on the problems Taiwanese companies have run into in China points to a very obvious fact ("We walk on thin ice in China," Sept. 5, page 8).
Bluntly put, my answer to this is, What in hell did you expect?
Instead, I would suggest Taiwan turn to the safest, most democratic and friendly country in the world: Canada.
Don Corrigan
Stoney Creek, Ontario";
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations