The Russian mini submarine Mir-1 reached the seabed more than 4,000m beneath the surface of the Arctic Ocean on Aug. 2 and left a cylinder of titanium containing a Russian flag to proclaim Russia's sovereignty over the Arctic. Russia claims that the Lomonosov Ridge, which extends nearly 2,000km through the Arctic, is a natural extension of the Siberian continental shelf. Therefore, it says, an area of 1.6 million square kilometers of the Arctic, including the North Pole, should belong to Russia.
After Russia laid claim to the Arctic, Canada announced that it would establish a military training center 600km south of the North Pole in Resolute Bay, a deepwater port in Nanisivik on the north tip of Baffin Island, and it plans to spend US$7.1 billion on ice-breaking patrol ships to prevent encroachment on its territory.
Meanwhile, Denmark said it would send a team of scientists to the Arctic to collect scientific evidence that the Lomonosov Ridge is directly connected to Greenland.
The US believes that the Northeast Passage is neutral, and along with Canada, have proclaimed that Russia's planting a flag has no legal significance.
In addition to those countries, Norway also claims to have sovereignty over the Arctic. With the growing shortage of energy sources, its very possible that the dispute could stir up a new global battle for maritime hegemony.
According to US surveys, the oil and natural gas stores beneath the Arctic account for about one-fourth of the global total. As global warming melts the ice, it will be easier to extract the resources. Countries neighboring the Arctic Sea like Russia, Canada, the US, Iceland, Norway, Finland, Denmark and Sweden are all very interested in the resources in the region.
Moreover, as the ice melts, more shipping lanes could open up. The Northwest Passage, which connects many Arctic islands, is the most direct route between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. The sea shipping lanes between Europe and Asia could shrink by 2,500km.
This struggle for the Arctic Ocean has already caught world attention.
Meanwhile, on the other side of the world, in East Asian waters, other contests for supremacy have already quietly been going on for some time.
For example, the Diaoyutai Islands have long been an unresolved dispute between Taiwan, Japan and China. There have been constant arguments between the fishing and oil industries, especially between China and Japan.
South Korea dispatched soldiers to occupy the Liancourt Rocks and planted its flag on the ocean floor to claim its sovereignty over them. Of course Japan was none too pleased, and tensions have run very high between the two countries over ocean research.
Japan recently passed the Basic Ocean Law and plans to create a maritime affairs minister. It also plans to plant coral reefs around Okinotori Islands and put manmade structures on them to boost the claim that it is an island, which would give Japan exclusive economic control of the waters 370km around them.
After Sept. 11, in the name of peace, Japan has dispatched troops to East Timor, extending its power into the South China Sea to compete with China, whose warships in recent years have been actively trying to probe the waters around Taiwan and break the chain of coastal islands surrounding it, thereby carving up the East Asian seas. These are developments that Taiwan should pay particular attention to.
However, Taiwan's progress in maritime affairs has been exceedingly slow. Right now, there is only a task force under the Executive Yuan called the maritime affairs promotion committee which needs development to be effective. This means that maritime projects still have to wait for a real driving push and efforts to remake government organizations are often neglected during election time. The proposed establishment of a ministry of marine affairs has never taken shape, making future prospects bleak.
According to UN rules, countries bordering the sea must report detailed surveys of their continental shelves in May 2009 to be able to claim exclusive economic control of the waters around them. Although Taiwan has been doing this work over the past two years, it has been hampered by budget and time restraints.
Meanwhile, Taiwan is not a member of the UN, which leads to serious questions: How will Taiwan lay its claim? What will its argument be based on? What will make its claim valid? How will rights be protected, and will there be additional funding?
Taiwan's deep-water tuna fishing industry is one of the most profitable in the world, yet it has been sanctioned by international organizations. Although its quotas have returned to their original numbers, how will it manage to sustain itself with the surge in international oil and operating costs? Can the government effectively guide and assist Taiwan's international first-rate yacht manufacturing industry and blue water navy, and protect their human resources and maintain their competitiveness?
With gas and oil prices growing, the seabed has become a new battleground for resources. It's obvious that Russia is trying to recapture its old glory, and its claim for Arctic sovereignty might very well have set off a new battle for supremacy on the oceans for the new century. Taiwan is surrounded on all sides by ocean. Yet even as countries actively try to expand their ocean domains, Taiwan's prospects as a maritime nation seem ever more dim.
We hope that officials will rspond to this situation and rbe prepared to fight for Taiwan's ocean domain. Taiwan cannot lose this valuable commodity.
Chiau Wen-yen is a professor and director of the Institute of Marine Resource Management at National Taiwan Ocean University.
Translated by Marc Langer.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with