"Infringing the reputation of a commodity" is the latest punishable offense in China, as reporter/baozi connoisseur Zi Beijia (
For daring to shed any unflattering light on China's rampant food quality problems, Mr Zi will be spending the next year or so behind bars while being force-fed an all-baozi diet and writing self-criticisms about how he will not do anything else to create a "vile social influence" again, as the official line now goes.
Oh yes, and he will also have to pay a 1,000 yuan (US$130) fine for his transgression. I suppose this is to cover what it will cost the state to feed and house him for a year.
For a country with a long and proud tradition of juvenile name-calling and comically inane slogans, "infringing the reputation of a commodity" is a stand out achievement. I can only assume that the judges have one of those magic eight balls filled with criminal-sounding words that they shake up until they have a sufficiently malicious-sounding crime.
Internet rumors say that when the judges were deciding what charge to invent to put Zi behind bars, "infringing the reputation of a commodity" only narrowly beat out "verbal sodomy of motherland pastry."
I decided to do a little snooping around on the old YouTube and found the videos of Zi's original report, his sentencing and Beijing TV's apology.
To begin with, I must say that those baozi in Zi's original report don't look half bad. Ok, so there's a little paper in them. So what? Do you really find cardboard more unpalatable than diced pig scrotum?
Apparently the cardboard was soaked in some chemical. Now, anyone who has gone to use the restroom at a restaurant in China and found that the lavatory also doubles as a food storage closet knows that having some sort of powerful bacteria-killing chemical injected into your food is not always such a bad thing.
In fact, I would say the cardboard is the least of a consumer's worries. I would be more concerned about the fact that the chef isn't wearing any pants. Or shirt. Or shoes.
The only "hairnet" he dons is a grubby pair of boxers covering his unmentionables.
But the really odd thing about the report is that at the end it shows policemen arriving on scene, while the narrator says that "after finding sufficient evidence" the authorities "clamped down according to the law" on the illegal proprietors.
Sounds like the police were fairly certain that the paper baozi were for real. At least until the higher-ups got involved and suddenly changed their minds.
The next clip I perused was the apology from the TV station, during which the anchor relates how the government food safety agencies were very concerned by the report, and formed teams to conduct thorough investigations of the "breakfast market." After their search turned up nothing suspicious -- surprise! -- the police were called in to investigate again and this time produced the "truth" that the story was a fake. The station vows to deal with the issue "severely" and says that it will work to improve the "political quality" as well as "moral quality" of its reporting.
The grand finale of the whole sordid affair is the sentencing. Zi, who looks like he is about 16 years old and pushing 50kg, is flanked immediately to his left by some generic rent-a-thug security officer with an earpiece. Zi has a seat alone in the middle of the court, while the microphone in front of him is hung with a sign reading "the accused." To his right is his "defense person" -- I can only assume he is a lawyer -- who is faced across the room by a team of three prosecutors. Staring Zi down from the front is an array of judges who look more like they should be issuing a major constitutional interpretation rather than locking up some no-name reporter.
Zi stumbles through an awkward and clearly rehearsed speech, the main thrust of which is not that he has ruined China's reputation or damaged the livelihoods of innocent vendors. Rather, he concentrates on ominously warning other reporters not to follow in his footsteps -- or at least that's the portion of the speech that state-run CCTV found worth broadcasting.
The funny thing is that if the Chicoms had just let it go, the story would have been forgotten in no time. It wasn't even a major report. The broadcast was barely two minutes long. But now, by locking away yet another reporter, they've made it international news.
Bravo, you incompetents.
My beloved country, meanwhile, has been tackling food safety issues with a vengeance. In fact, Taiwan has been so stringent with its food safety measures that the whole damn country would starve if we actually enforced them properly.
The ban on the pig feed additive ractopamine was the latest bar to be lowered after food and health officials decided to go back on their earlier tough talk against the drug because ... er, well ... they just changed their minds.
Meanwhile, last month, another shipment of US wheat didn't pass inspection because it contained residue of the insecticide malathion. This sent health and food officials scrambling because the wheat, of which Taiwanese eat about 1 million tonnes per year and which is used in about half of all Taiwan's dough products, according to the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times' sister newspaper) is almost all imported. Moreover, Taiwan gets only about two shipments per month and has just two weeks' supply in store.
So why, one might ask, were the same shipments suddenly refused? Increased concern over food safety? Don't be silly. As it turned out, the government's testing equipment was too old and outdated to actually test for malathion. Then, this summer, the new and more sensitive equipment comes in and -- golly gee, isn't this embarrassing -- turns out they've been letting this malathion through the whole time.
Huang Ching-ho (
I hope the authorities have got their act together and changed that rule. But just in case, I'm going to stock up on carbohydrates this weekend. Pasta, toast and as many jiaozi and baozi of the non-cardboard variety as my stomach can handle.
Heard or read something particularly objectionable about Taiwan? Johnny wants to know: email@example.com is the place to reach me, with "Dear Johnny" in the subject line.
South China Sea exercises in July by two United States Navy nuclear-powered aircraft carriers reminds that Taiwan’s history since mid-1950, and as a free nation, is intertwined with that of the aircraft carrier. Eventually Taiwan will host aircraft carriers, either those built under its democratic government or those imposed on its territory by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN). By September 1944, a lack of sufficient carrier airpower and land-based airpower persuaded US Army and Navy leaders to forgo an invasion to wrest Taiwan from Japanese control, thereby sparing Taiwanese considerable wartime destruction. But two
This year, India and Taiwan can look back on 25 years of so-called unofficial ties. This provides an occasion to ponder over how they can deepen collaboration and strengthen their relations. This reflection must be free from excitement and agitation caused by the ongoing China-US great power jostling as well as China’s aggressive actions against many of its neighbors, including India. It must be based on long-term trends in bilateral engagement. To begin with, India and Taiwan, thus far, have had relations constituted by various activities, but what needs to be thought about now is whether they can transform their ties
On Thursday last week, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo delivered a barnstorming speech at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum in Yorba Linda, California, titled “Communist China and the Free World’s Future.” The speech set out in no uncertain terms the insoluble ideological divide between a totalitarian, communist China and the democratic, free-market values of the US. It was also a full-throated call to arms for all nations of the free world to rally behind the US and defeat China. Pompeo elaborated on a clear distinction between China and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), in an attempt to recalibrate the
As Taiwan is engulfed in worries about Chinese infiltration, news reports have revealed that power inverters made by China’s Huawei Technologies Co are used in the solar panels on the top of the Legislative Yuan’s Zhenjiang House (鎮江會館) on Zhenjiang Street in Taipei. However, what is even more worrying is that Taiwan’s new national electronic identification card (eID) has been subcontracted to the French security firm and eID maker Idemia, which has not only cooperated with the Chinese Public Security Bureau to manufacture eIDs in China, but also makes the new identification cards being issued in Hong Kong. There might be more