"Infringing the reputation of a commodity" is the latest punishable offense in China, as reporter/baozi connoisseur Zi Beijia (
For daring to shed any unflattering light on China's rampant food quality problems, Mr Zi will be spending the next year or so behind bars while being force-fed an all-baozi diet and writing self-criticisms about how he will not do anything else to create a "vile social influence" again, as the official line now goes.
Oh yes, and he will also have to pay a 1,000 yuan (US$130) fine for his transgression. I suppose this is to cover what it will cost the state to feed and house him for a year.
For a country with a long and proud tradition of juvenile name-calling and comically inane slogans, "infringing the reputation of a commodity" is a stand out achievement. I can only assume that the judges have one of those magic eight balls filled with criminal-sounding words that they shake up until they have a sufficiently malicious-sounding crime.
Internet rumors say that when the judges were deciding what charge to invent to put Zi behind bars, "infringing the reputation of a commodity" only narrowly beat out "verbal sodomy of motherland pastry."
I decided to do a little snooping around on the old YouTube and found the videos of Zi's original report, his sentencing and Beijing TV's apology.
To begin with, I must say that those baozi in Zi's original report don't look half bad. Ok, so there's a little paper in them. So what? Do you really find cardboard more unpalatable than diced pig scrotum?
Apparently the cardboard was soaked in some chemical. Now, anyone who has gone to use the restroom at a restaurant in China and found that the lavatory also doubles as a food storage closet knows that having some sort of powerful bacteria-killing chemical injected into your food is not always such a bad thing.
In fact, I would say the cardboard is the least of a consumer's worries. I would be more concerned about the fact that the chef isn't wearing any pants. Or shirt. Or shoes.
The only "hairnet" he dons is a grubby pair of boxers covering his unmentionables.
But the really odd thing about the report is that at the end it shows policemen arriving on scene, while the narrator says that "after finding sufficient evidence" the authorities "clamped down according to the law" on the illegal proprietors.
Sounds like the police were fairly certain that the paper baozi were for real. At least until the higher-ups got involved and suddenly changed their minds.
The next clip I perused was the apology from the TV station, during which the anchor relates how the government food safety agencies were very concerned by the report, and formed teams to conduct thorough investigations of the "breakfast market." After their search turned up nothing suspicious -- surprise! -- the police were called in to investigate again and this time produced the "truth" that the story was a fake. The station vows to deal with the issue "severely" and says that it will work to improve the "political quality" as well as "moral quality" of its reporting.
The grand finale of the whole sordid affair is the sentencing. Zi, who looks like he is about 16 years old and pushing 50kg, is flanked immediately to his left by some generic rent-a-thug security officer with an earpiece. Zi has a seat alone in the middle of the court, while the microphone in front of him is hung with a sign reading "the accused." To his right is his "defense person" -- I can only assume he is a lawyer -- who is faced across the room by a team of three prosecutors. Staring Zi down from the front is an array of judges who look more like they should be issuing a major constitutional interpretation rather than locking up some no-name reporter.
Zi stumbles through an awkward and clearly rehearsed speech, the main thrust of which is not that he has ruined China's reputation or damaged the livelihoods of innocent vendors. Rather, he concentrates on ominously warning other reporters not to follow in his footsteps -- or at least that's the portion of the speech that state-run CCTV found worth broadcasting.
The funny thing is that if the Chicoms had just let it go, the story would have been forgotten in no time. It wasn't even a major report. The broadcast was barely two minutes long. But now, by locking away yet another reporter, they've made it international news.
Bravo, you incompetents.
My beloved country, meanwhile, has been tackling food safety issues with a vengeance. In fact, Taiwan has been so stringent with its food safety measures that the whole damn country would starve if we actually enforced them properly.
The ban on the pig feed additive ractopamine was the latest bar to be lowered after food and health officials decided to go back on their earlier tough talk against the drug because ... er, well ... they just changed their minds.
Meanwhile, last month, another shipment of US wheat didn't pass inspection because it contained residue of the insecticide malathion. This sent health and food officials scrambling because the wheat, of which Taiwanese eat about 1 million tonnes per year and which is used in about half of all Taiwan's dough products, according to the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times' sister newspaper) is almost all imported. Moreover, Taiwan gets only about two shipments per month and has just two weeks' supply in store.
So why, one might ask, were the same shipments suddenly refused? Increased concern over food safety? Don't be silly. As it turned out, the government's testing equipment was too old and outdated to actually test for malathion. Then, this summer, the new and more sensitive equipment comes in and -- golly gee, isn't this embarrassing -- turns out they've been letting this malathion through the whole time.
Huang Ching-ho (
I hope the authorities have got their act together and changed that rule. But just in case, I'm going to stock up on carbohydrates this weekend. Pasta, toast and as many jiaozi and baozi of the non-cardboard variety as my stomach can handle.
Heard or read something particularly objectionable about Taiwan? Johnny wants to know: dearjohnny@taipeitimes.com is the place to reach me, with "Dear Johnny" in the subject line.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry