We want to express our deep disappointment with the verdict of the Taipei District Court in former Taipei mayor Ma Ying-jeou's (
The court found Ma, who is also the Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) presidential candidate, not guilty of embezzling funds from his special mayoral allowance.
When Ma was first accused of using his special mayoral allowance for his own expenses, he repeatedly asserted to the Taipei City Council and the press that he had only used his special allowance for public affairs and charities.
After prosecutor Hou Kuan-jen (
When this became known, Ma changed his tune and flatly lied, claiming he had never said the special allowance was only for public affairs.
He also said that his answers as recorded in the transcript of his indictment were the result of leading questions or the prosecutor intentionally twisting Ma's statements out of context.
It's not unusual for people to lie when caught red-handed. Ma, however, has lied about his special mayoral allowance in the capacity of Taipei mayor, KMT chairman and KMT presidential candidate. It is despicable to see a politician behave this way. He obviously has no scruples about deceiving the public.
What is so disappointing is that the court accepted Ma's claims and disregarded certain evidence that may have incriminated him, such as electronic documents, and handed down a ruling without first hearing the whole story.
In addition, the court adopted the charges made by Ma and his lawyers against the prosecutor. In the verdict, the court reprimanded Hou, saying the transcript was not true to what had been said, that he had taken statements out of context, that he had violated the Criminal Procedure Law (
As to the nature of the special allowance, despite stricter interpretations by other government institutions, the court adopted the loosest possible standard, calling the special allowance a "substantial subsidy."
The court has not done its job, and the public is now doubting whether our judicial system is capable of looking at things objectively and professionally to uphold the law.
Nevertheless, we still have faith in the court system and respect it. The judicial system is the last line of defense for justice, but we still want to make an earnest appeal: Fairness and independence are the basis of this line of defense.
The courts should objectively consider all the facts. The judiciary shoulders a heavy responsibility as an arbitrator that must be just and ignore political pressure.
The judiciary must be unbiased and have no double standards. It has to be a balancing force.
A verdict too far removed from public opinion or one that goes flagrantly against public expectations makes it impossible for the judiciary to be a buffer between the two opposing sides, instead turning it into a tool that exacerbates the problem and pulling the judiciary down with it.
We urge the prosecutor to immediately file an appeal. The High Court must offer a detailed explanation and legal interpretation in its verdict to assure the public that it is fair.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry