The wily leader of North Korea, Kim Jong-il, appears to have taken a giant step toward getting his nation accepted as a nuclear weapons state.
When the North and South Koreans announced last week that South Korean President Roh Moo-hyun had been granted a summit meeting in Pyongyang late this month, immediate speculation held that Roh would try to persuade Kim to abandon his nuclear ambitions.
Skeptical South Koreans, Americans, and Japanese experienced in analyzing North Korea contended that, instead, Kim would urge Roh to acknowledge that North Korea had become a nuclear weapons state.
A former foreign minister of South Korea, Han Sung-joo, said at an academic conference in Honolulu that despite the apparent progress in negotiations intended to end Kim Jong-il's nuclear ambitions, "North Korea is on the way to being recognized as a nuclear weapons state."
Han said the critical question for South Korea, Japan, the US, China and Russia, which have been negotiating with North Korea in six party talks, was to determine "how we can live with a North Korea that has nuclear weapons."
Kim has been seeking for years to have nations represented in the negotiations agree that his nation had been armed with nuclear weapons.
India and Pakistan disclosed they had acquired nuclear weapons by testing them in 1998. North Korea tested a nuclear device last October. As agreed in February, North Korea has shut down its nuclear plant in Yongbyon, but nothing more.
In Asia, the political leader who travels to see another is often considered a supplicant before a superior in a position to demand concessions. Kim is expected to urge Roh to concede North Korea's right to retain nuclear arms, estimated at 10 to 12 weapons, in return for a pledge of peace.
That was underscored when Roh agreed to go to Pyongyang even though Kim had promised, during a summit in Pyongyang with then South Korean president Kim Dae-jung in 2000, that he would make a return visit to Seoul. He has not kept that pledge and Roh has brushed it aside.
A Roh concession to Kim Jong-il on nuclear arms would most likely crack the unity of the five nations bargaining with North Korea in talks hosted by China in Beijing. Both South Korean and US sources said Washington was given only a few hours notice that the summit would be announced. Presumably, Beijing, Tokyo and Moscow were given similar short notice.
Moreover, Han said, allowing North Korea to have nuclear arms would make South Korea and Japan, against which North Korea has aimed hundreds of missiles, even more dependent on the US for security, especially the "nuclear umbrella."
That would require a US retaliatory strike if North Korea attacked either South Korea or Japan.
In addition to concessions from South Korea, the summit is intended to shore up Kim Jong-il's standing at home. Repeated rumors have wafted out of the hermit kingdom that Kim Jong-il is either ill or a group of dissenters have become dissatisfied with his rule, especially the mismanagement of the economy.
Kim Jong-il has sought to dispel those rumors by visiting army posts and factories.
Last week, he gave "on-site guidance" to workers at the Songjin Steel Complex. The official Korean Central News Agency said Kim Jong-ilurged them to display "revolutionary enthusiasm and creative ingenuity under the difficult situation," an oblique reference to North Korea's crumbling economy.
Further, Kim Jong-il is evidently seeking to influence South Korea's presidential election in December so that a candidate favoring concessions to North Korea would be elected. Similarly, South Koreans said Roh hopes to influence the campaign to help elect a candidate who would follow his policies. Roh is limited to one five-year term.
Choson Ilbo, a newspaper generally critical of Roh, opposed the summit meeting, asserting: "This is a presidential election scheme."
The paper continued: "There's no national consensus, no transparency in the way it was arranged and no justification."
The South Korean government said a senior intelligence officer had set up the summit in two secret trips to Pyongyang recently. A presidential spokesman contended: "The spirit of the upcoming summit is reconciliation and transparency."
Choson Ilbo further asserted: "There's no way of knowing what kind of political deal has been struck under the table."
That referred to reports of secret payments made by Kim Dae-jung to North Korea for his summit in 2000.
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry